Skip to content

· Private foundation

Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$286k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Philanthropy$192kCrime & Legal$187kReligion$163kHealth$126kEducation$108kCivil Rights$65kFood & Nutrition$47kHuman Services$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $242k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS$30,000
CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK$30,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPA$30,000
BEST POINT EDUCATION & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$20,000
FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC$20,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUN$20,000
FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC$15,000
THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE INC$15,000
CAROLINA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER$12,000
COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC$10,000
URBAN COMPASSION PROJECT$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$10,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPA$10,000
AUTISM INSPIRED INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN ANGELS SF: $5k → 10%TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YMCA: $7k → 13%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $2k → 17%BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
OH
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$644k · 17 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$644k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+1%

Still filing today

82%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PTA-CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $71k · revenue +20%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +0%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +152%
  • BF
    BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +79%
  • TO
    The Oakland REACH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Florida Inc

To promote civil liberties through communication and interaction with and between the citizens and legislators of the state of florida

Civil Rights
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
4
Florida's Children First Inc

Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…

Human Services
5
Public Counsel

Public counsel is a nonprofit public interest law firm dedicated to advancing civil rights and racial and economic justice, as well as to amplifying the power of our clients through comprehensive legal advocacy. (see sch o for…

Crime & Legal
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Aclu Foundation of Southern California

See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through litigation, policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil…

Civil Rights
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
11
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carolina Wildlife Conservation Cent Er. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPA: $120,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPAPTA-CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS: $70,500 · OtherPTA-CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTSAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUN: $35,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNCONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $30,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEKBEST POINT EDUCATION & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $20,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $18,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC: $17,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $23,000 · OtherAUTISM INSPIRED INC: $20,000 · Other+19 more: $121,000 · Other+19 moreJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $185,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of…COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY WORK…FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA HOLOCA…FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION: $65,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Civil RightsPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 · HealthAbortion Fund of Ohio: $8,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $2,500 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $16,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 · InternationalTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $15,000 · EducationUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $12,000 · EducationThe Oakland REACH: $10,000 · Education
Other$474,500Philanthropy$185,000Arts & Culture$133,000Civil Rights$80,000Health$68,500International$56,000Education$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $185,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC: $110,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPTA-CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS: $70,500 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetFLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION: $65,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM INSPIRED INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Oakland REACH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAbortion Fund of Ohio: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Angels SF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetONBIKES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII WILDLIFE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOOSE LOVE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Federation of Cincinnati · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Community Action Stops Abuse Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Autism Inspired Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Holocaust Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Onbikes Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph