Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Deacons of Deadwood

DEACONS OF DEADWOOD hosts fundraising events consisting of dinner/dances, raffles, and silent auctions.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$512kEducation$307kRecreation & Sports$190kCrime & Legal$185kHuman Services$46kFood & Nutrition$13k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $98,175 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $106,420 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,245 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $92k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP QUALITY TEXAS$17,500
CHILD ADVOCATES$12,000
HIS GRACE FOUNDATION$12,000
CHILDREN AT RISK$10,000
Foundation for Autism Care$10,000
ARCHWAY ACADEMY$10,000
Kings Academy$10,000
ADDIS FAITH FOUNDATION$10,000
Brighter Bites$6,675
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $214k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $28k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $19k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $18k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%HARRISON'S HEROES: $20k → 16%HARRISON'S HEROS: $13k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $18k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $15k → 16%Kids Meals Inc: $7k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+387%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Addis Faith Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $177k · revenue +265%
  • AA
    ARCHWAY ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +21%
  • HG
    His Grace Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $141k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR SUCCESS AND INDEPENDENCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +4%
  • KM
    KIDS' MEALS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +387%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
3
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

6
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
7
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Kids Crossing

Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.

Human Services
10
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

11
Bounce Children's Foundation

Bounce children's foundation transforms the lives of chronically ill children, and their families, shifting all from surviving to thriving.

Health
12
Congenital Hyperinsulinism International

Congenital Hyperinsulinism International (CHI) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation dedicated to improving the lives of babies, children, and adults affected by congenital hyperinsulinism (HI). HI is a life-threatening genetic disorder…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Success and Independence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Addis Faith Foundation — $177,000 · HealthAddis Faith FoundationFOUNDATION FOR AUTISM CARE EDUCATION AND SERVICES — $56,500 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR AUTISM CARE EDUC…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $52,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONThe Devereux Foundation — $42,500 · HealthThe Devereux FoundationCENTER FOR SUCCESS AND INDEPENDENCE INC — $22,500 · HealthCENTER FOR SUCCESS AND INDEPEND…KING'S ACADEMY — $154,500 · EducationKING'S ACADEMYARCHWAY ACADEMY — $152,500 · EducationARCHWAY ACADEMYHis Grace Foundation — $141,000 · Human ServicesHis Grace Foundatio…HARRISON'S HEROES — $33,000 · Human ServicesHARRISON'S HEROESBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $33,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS COUN…+1 more — $6,500 · Human ServicesCAMP QUALITY TEXAS — $144,500 · OtherCAMP QUALITY TEXA…FIRST COLONY LITTLE LEAGUE — $45,500 · OtherFIRST COLONY LITT…CHILD ADVOCATES INC — $124,500 · Crime & LegalCHILD ADVOCATES …Children At Risk — $60,000 · Crime & LegalChildren At RiskBrighter Bites Inc — $6,675 · Food & Nutrition
Health$351,000Education$307,000Human Services$213,500Other$190,000Crime & Legal$184,500Food & Nutrition$6,675

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAddis Faith Foundation — $177,000 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetKING'S ACADEMY — $154,500 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetARCHWAY ACADEMY — $152,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetHis Grace Foundation — $141,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $124,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetChildren At Risk — $60,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AUTISM CARE EDUCATION AND SERVICES — $56,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $52,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST COLONY LITTLE LEAGUE — $45,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation — $42,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARRISON'S HEROES — $33,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $33,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBrighter Bites Inc — $6,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Addis Faith Foundation
  • Who funds KING'S ACADEMY
  • Who funds ARCHWAY ACADEMY
  • Who funds His Grace Foundation
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC
  • Who funds Children At Risk
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM CARE EDUCATION AND SERVICES
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FIRST COLONY LITTLE LEAGUE
  • Who funds The Devereux Foundation
  • Who funds HARRISON'S HEROES
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SUCCESS AND INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds Brighter Bites Inc
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Deacons of Deadwood funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Deacons of Deadwood?

    Find your warmest path to Deacons of Deadwood through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph