Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

De Quattro Family Foundation

$10k
Granted FY2020
41
Grants FY2020
11
States reached
$900
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
11
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St John the Baptist Cathodic church$900
St Camillus catholic church$750
UPLIFT Haiti Inc$500
World Central Kitchen$500
Pachyonychia Congenita Project$500
Maryland Food Bank$450
Greater Boston Food Bank$450
MidSouth Food Bank$256
Soul Fire Farm$250
Team Brownsville Inc$250
Nicks Place$250
Network for Good$206
Earthdance Organic Farming School$206
Planting Justice$206
You Gotta Believe$206
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $306) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%You Gotta Believe: $206 → 20%American Red Cross: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
9
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
10
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
12
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Michaels House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Food Pantries & AssistanceLand Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterSubstance Abuse TreatmentGovernment Accountability R…Independent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCH — $900 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCHSt Camillus catholic church — $750 · OtherSt Camillus catholic churchPachyonychia Congenita Project — $500 · OtherPachyonychia Congenita ProjectUPLIFT HAITI — $500 · OtherUPLIFT HAITITHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $450 · OtherTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INCGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $450 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCNETWORK FOR GOOD — $206 · Other+16 more — $2,350 · Other+16 moreMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK — $256 · Food & NutritionMID-SOUTH …SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC — $250 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE …EarthDance — $206 · Food & NutritionEarthDanceCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $200 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AR…Planting Justice — $206 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $200 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $200 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $100 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $50 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $500 · InternationalSURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA) — $100 · InternationalTeambrownsville Inc — $250 · Human ServicesYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC — $206 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 · Human ServicesNICK'S PLACE INC — $250 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $200 · HealthPRO PUBLICA INC — $200 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,106Food & Nutrition$912Environment$756International$600Human Services$556Health$450Arts & Culture$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK — $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICK'S PLACE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeambrownsville Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanting Justice — $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC — $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarthDance — $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichaels House Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA) — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT dba BLACK WOMENS HEALTH IMPERATIVE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization De Quattro Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph