Skip to content
De Quattro Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

De Quattro Family Foundation

$10k
Granted FY2020
41
Grants FY2020
11
States reached
$900
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
11
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St John the Baptist Cathodic church$900
St Camillus catholic church$750
World Central Kitchen$500
UPLIFT Haiti Inc$500
Pachyonychia Congenita Project$500
Greater Boston Food Bank$450
Maryland Food Bank$450
MidSouth Food Bank$256
Team Brownsville Inc$250
Nicks Place$250
Soul Fire Farm$250
Earthdance Organic Farming School$206
Network for Good$206
You Gotta Believe$206
Planting Justice$206
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $306) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%You Gotta Believe: $206 → 20%American Red Cross: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
9
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
10
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
11
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Michaels House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCH: $900 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCHSt Camillus catholic church: $750 · OtherSt Camillus catholic churchPachyonychia Congenita Project: $500 · OtherPachyonychia Congenita ProjectUPLIFT HAITI: $500 · OtherUPLIFT HAITITHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $450 · OtherTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INCGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $450 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCNETWORK FOR GOOD: $206 · Other+16 more: $2,350 · Other+16 moreMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $256 · Food & NutritionMID-SOUTH …SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $250 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE …EarthDance: $206 · Food & NutritionEarthDanceCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $200 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AR…Planting Justice: $206 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $200 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $200 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $100 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $50 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 · InternationalSURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA): $100 · InternationalTeambrownsville Inc: $250 · Human ServicesYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $206 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 · Human ServicesNICK'S PLACE INC: $250 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200 · HealthPRO PUBLICA INC: $200 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,106Food & Nutrition$912Environment$756International$600Human Services$556Health$450Arts & Culture$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICK'S PLACE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeambrownsville Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarthDance: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanting Justice: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichaels House Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA): $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT dba BLACK WOMENS HEALTH IMPERATIVE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization De Quattro Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from De Quattro Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on De Quattro Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home