Skip to content
De la Torre Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

De la Torre Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$116kHealth$44kEducation$15kInternational$10kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$4kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$1,029
Median grant
4
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THERES STILL HOPE$10,600
THE COVENANT SCHOOL$10,000
REMNANT HOUSE$1,029
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
THE ALLEGHENY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EMBRACE GRACE: $3k → 11%EMBRACE GRACE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
TN
NC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 13 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$143k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+32%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DG
    DESIRING GOD MINISTRIES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $16k · revenue +10%
  • SI
    SHEEP INC HEALTH CARE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +82%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • WW
    WORD & WORSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • WF
    WHITE FIELDS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • EM
    East-West Ministries International
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Explore God Network
—
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
4
Good News Publishers

Crossway is a not-for-profit Christian publishing ministry of Good News Publishers that exists to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ through publishing and other means, in order, by God's grace: to bring people to Christ as their Lord and…

—
5
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
6
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
7
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
8
The Grace Message

The Grace Message exists to share the hope and encouragement found in the New Covenant message of Gods grace by helping people embrace the finished work of Christ, walk in their new identity, and enjoy freedom from lifeless religion.

Religion
9
Praise Broadcasting Inc

Praise broadcasting's (praisefm) vision is to see every tribe and nation experiencing jesus together. our mission is simple: together we help people discover and worship jesus. more than a radio station, praisefm is a place where…

Religion
10
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
11
Angel Christian Television Trust Inc

Our mission is to go into all the world and preach the Gospel through all forms of media and broadcast. We are a Christian organization spreading the word of God to the ends of the earth.

Religion
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Desiring God Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH WAY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY: $33,000 · OtherNORTH WAY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITYWORD & WORSHIP CHURCH: $13,100 · OtherWORD & WORSHIP CHURCHGATEWAY CHURCH: $12,500 · OtherGATEWAY CHURCHBRIDGECITY CHURCH: $10,500 · OtherBRIDGECITY CHURCHWHITE FIELDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherALLISON PARK CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $5,000 · OtherLIFE CHURCH INC: $3,500 · Other+12 more: $18,329 · Other+12 moreDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $16,000 · ReligionDESIRING GOD MINISTRIESSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEGREATER EUROPE MISSION: $8,075 · ReligionGREATER EUROPE MISSIONEast-West Ministries International: $4,500 · ReligionEast-West Ministries Int…ARMADA DISCIPLESHIP: $3,000 · ReligionARMADA DISCIPLESHIP+2 more: $1,500 · ReligionTHERES STILL HOPE: $21,750 · HealthTHERES STILL HOPESHEEP INC HEALTH CARE CENTER: $13,388 · HealthSHEEP INC HEALTH CARE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthCovenant Knights School: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationEmbrace Grace Inc: $3,500 · Human ServicesEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$100,929Religion$43,075Health$37,638Education$15,000Human Services$3,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHERES STILL HOPE: $21,750 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHEEP INC HEALTH CARE CENTER: $13,388 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCovenant Knights School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER EUROPE MISSION: $8,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmbrace Grace Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARMADA DISCIPLESHIP: $3,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES FOR THE UNBORN INC DBA BUCKS COUNTY PRO-LIFE COALITION: $2,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Usher Family Foundati…Servant FoundationCommunity Foundation …AbbVie FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Renaissance Charitabl…Raymond James Charita…The Ayco Charitable F…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Usher Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · AbbVie Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization De la Torre Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from De la Torre Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on De la Torre’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home