Skip to content

· Private foundation

David and Terri Kester Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$717kFood & Nutrition$404kPublic Safety & Disaster$363kEducation$219kHousing & Shelter$211kPublic Benefit$160kEnvironment$150kReligion$76kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $401k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$40,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$35,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$30,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$30,000
FEEDING AMERICA$30,000
USFUND FOR UNICEF$25,000
WORLD VISION INC$25,000
MANNA FOODBANK$25,000
ASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
UNC CHAPEL HILL$25,000
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY$21,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$20,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IA
CT
RI
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 18 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+77%

Still filing today

72%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $218k · revenue +9%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $217k · revenue +89%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $203k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +23%
  • HE
    HOPE EQUINE RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +346%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
8
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
11
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $216,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $202,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncWORLD VISION INC: $170,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $166,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $127,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $166,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $162,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAP…CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $145,025 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $97,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL …SISTERS OF MERCY-NORTHEAST COMMUNITY: $71,000 · OtherSISTERS OF MERCY-NORTHEAST COMMUNITYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $60,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCOMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC DBA 907 WMFE: $27,500 · Other+7 more: $28,500 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $217,500 · Human ServicesAmerican N…COVENANT HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE ANTI-FRAUD COALITION: $160,000 · EducationTHE ANTI-F…CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · EducationCLARKSON U…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…Feeding America: $105,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $90,000 · EnvironmentASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
International$882,500Other$758,025Human Services$227,500Education$216,000Food & Nutrition$140,000Environment$90,000Housing & Shelter$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $217,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $216,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $202,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $170,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $166,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTI-FRAUD COALITION: $160,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $127,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $97,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $36,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD PARROT TRUST USA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE EQUINE RESCUE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTI-FRAUD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PARROT TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HORSES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Terri Kester Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Terri Kester Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David and Terri Kester Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to David and Terri Kester Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Terri Kester’s filings →

More from the funding graph