Skip to content

· Private foundation

David and Ruth Gorton Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$155kHealth$63kHuman Services$45kEducation$40kReligion$33kCivil Rights$25kFood & Nutrition$23kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
885 FM$6,000
SAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATION$5,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$5,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
PATHFINDER NETWORK DBA PATHFINDERS OF OREGON$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS$3,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,750
LOS ANGELES GUILD FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH$2,500
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$2,500
MAKE A WISH$1,500
TREVOR PROJECT$1,500
RECONSTRUCTING JUDAISM$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $1k → 14%THE GREATER CONTRIBUTION: $1k → 10%TEXAS PRIDE IMPACT FUND: $1k → 14%THE GREATER CONTRIBUTION: $1k → 10%THE GREATER CONTRIBUTION: $1k → 10%FOOD ON FOOT: $5k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $1k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$359k · 31 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
22

Total granted

$359k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+28%

Still filing today

45%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $90k · revenue +101%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +30%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • PS
    PROJECT SHEMA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +24%
  • PI
    POPSTHECLUBCOM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
8
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
9
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
12
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
25/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

885 FM: $21,000 · Other885 FMSARASOTA ORCHESTRA: $20,000 · OtherSARASOTA ORCHESTRASAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherSAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATIONACLU FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA: $16,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATION OF FLORIDATEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $13,100 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ISRAELIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,435 · OtherALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $11,000 · Other+30 more: $103,500 · Other+30 moreFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE …Real News Project Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSarasota Opera Association Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $17,000 · HealthPLANNED P…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 · HealthVENICE FA…LOS ANGELES GUILD FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $4,500 · HealthLOS ANGEL…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,000 · Health+3 more: $3,000 · Health+3 moreCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationCOLGATE U…READY TO SUCCEED: $10,565 · EducationREADY TO …DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationDREXEL UN…BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationBRANDEIS …+1 more: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $1,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE: $1,000 · InternationalCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD ON FOOT: $7,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREATER CONTRIBUTION: $3,040 · Human ServicesTEXAS PRIDE IMPACT FUNDS: $1,000 · Human ServicesLAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$242,035Arts & Culture$100,000Health$41,500Education$39,065International$21,000Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$17,040

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $10,565 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ON FOOT: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOPSTHECLUBCOM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSarasota Opera Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CLEMENCY PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES GUILD FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $4,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRICKS AND MORTALS INC: $3,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREATER CONTRIBUTION: $3,040 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PRIDE IMPACT FUNDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CANCER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES AREA FOOD SHELF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStreets for All Los Angeles: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ON FOOT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POPSTHECLUBCOM INC ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Real News Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sarasota Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CLEMENCY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES GUILD FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BRICKS AND MORTALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER CONTRIBUTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Ruth Gorton Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Ruth Gorton Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David and Ruth Gorton Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to David and Ruth Gorton Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Ruth Gorton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph