Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

David and Leila Centner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of DAVID AND LEILA CENTNER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$72k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MIAMI PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE OPTIONS INC: $2k → 13%KROHN BREAKTHROUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE ONLINE AND CELL-PHONE COMMUNICATION: $2k → 7%COMMUNITY ACCESS CENTER INC: $3k → 13%GENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC: $10k → 15%GENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
OH
NJ
CA
UT
MO
VA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$69k · 6 repeat orgs$410k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
29

Total granted

$69k
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+102%

Still filing today

83%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k · revenue +222%
  • RY
    Renaissance Youth Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • AA
    ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $59k
  • NC
    NASSAU COUNTY AHRC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +72%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +115%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abraham and Lillian Rosenberg Foundation
—
2
The Ralph Lauren Corporate Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Afe Foundation

We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…

Health
4
Rosenberg Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Lichtenstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Corrona Research Foundation
Health
7
Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability Inc
Philanthropy
8
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
9
Kenneth & Nira Abramowitz Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Robert Rauschenberg Foundation
Arts & Culture
11
The Rodel Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Krohn Breakthrough Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Jewish Community FederationsProfessional Ballet Compani…Community Health CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Developmental Disabilities …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER — $58,500 · OtherADRIENNE ARSHT CENTERAARIZS ANGELS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherAARIZS ANGELS FOUNDATIONTHE HEBREW ACADEMY — $20,000 · OtherTHE HEBREW ACADEMYTEMPLE BETH SHOLOM — $18,375 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHOLOMBROOKVILLE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · OtherBROOKVILLE PARK FOUNDATION INCTHE MIAMI TROPICS BASKETBALL INC — $15,000 · OtherTHE MIAMI TROPICS BASKETBALL INCTHE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY - SPRING VALLEY C — $15,000 · OtherTHE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY - SPRING VALLEY CTHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherTHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATIONWOMEN HELPING WOMEN — $10,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL — $10,000 · OtherCHABAD OF ROSLYN INC — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PLATES INC DBA FOOD RESCUE US INC — $10,000 · OtherAFT DISASTER RELIEF FUND — $10,000 · Other+7 more — $29,600 · Other+7 moreJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureJORGE M PEREZ…OUR RESCUE — $20,000 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUEMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureMIAMI CITY BA…NASSAU COUNTY AHRC FOUNDATION INC — $35,500 · PhilanthropyNASSAU COUNTY…KEY BISCAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyKEY BISCAYNE …CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $2,500 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $25,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…CONVOY OF HOPE — $25,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF …Riverside University Health System Foundation — $25,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $12,500 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $4,000 · HealthGENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC — $17,500 · Human ServicesKROHN BREAKTHROUGH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACCESS CENTER INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesInstitute for Responsible Online an — $2,000 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc — $1,540 · Human ServicesRenaissance Youth Center — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LITTLE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$256,475Arts & Culture$65,000Philanthropy$63,000International$50,000Health$41,500Human Services$28,540Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNASSAU COUNTY AHRC FOUNDATION INC — $35,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRiverside University Health System Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC — $17,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LITTLE LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAFT DISASTER RELIEF FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $7,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEO INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKROHN BREAKTHROUGH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Responsible Online an — $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc — $1,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …Greater Miami Jewish …Mightycause Charitabl…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodFidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
The Miami Foundation IncFL16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David and Leila Centner Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Community Access Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David and Leila Centner Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to David and Leila Centner Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines