Skip to content

· Private foundation

David & Diane Toole Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$10kCivil Rights$8kHealth$7kFood & Nutrition$6kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$5kReligion$5kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$300
Median grant
6
States reached
$68k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
JOBS FOR THE FUTURE$10,000
BLUE FRONTIER$1,000
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$1,000
VISTA DEL MAR$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$750
JEWISH FEDERATION FAMILY CHILDREN$500
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$500
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS$500
FEEDING AMERICA$500
KQED$500
SECOND HARVEST$500
HIAS$400
J JEWISH NEWS$300
DED TO SP ED$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $500 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $500 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $250 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $200 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $360 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$98k · 30 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
43

Total granted

$98k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+17%

Still filing today

33%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • VD
    VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +39%
  • GF
    GLIDE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • AF
    Arlene Francis Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +61%
  • BA
    BAY AREA LYME FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +106%
  • TR
    THE RAPE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
5
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
6
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
7
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services; the most unlike its peers is Arlene Francis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
33/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOBS FOR THE FUTURE: $10,000 · OtherJOBS FOR THE FUTURE+61 more: $35,701 · Other+61 moreSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $4,750 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $2,800 · Arts & CultureProject Miracle: $840 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $451 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $750 · Arts & CultureVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,700 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $360 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesArlene Francis Foundation: $2,500 · EducationVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $100 · EducationHIAS INC: $1,400 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $250 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $200 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 · InternationalCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $1,350 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $900 · Food & NutritionBAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION: $1,600 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $200 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$105,701Arts & Culture$9,591Human Services$3,610Education$2,600International$2,300Food & Nutrition$2,250Philanthropy$1,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $2,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetArlene Francis Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProject Miracle: $840 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCheetah Conservation Fund: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $451 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALL OF THE SEA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVerified Voting Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBARCADERO MEDIA FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSIDE-PORTOLA VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ADVOCACY CONSERVATORSHIP AND TRUST INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE MUSIC ALIVE: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOVATO HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS CLUB: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Arlene Francis Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Project Miracle ↗
  • Who funds GUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Cheetah Conservation Fund ↗
  • Who funds OURMEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David & Diane Toole Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Diane Toole Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David & Diane Toole Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David & Diane Toole Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David & Diane Toole’s filings →

More from the funding graph