Skip to content
David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$409k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$449kHealth$252kFood & Nutrition$220kYouth Development$180kHousing & Shelter$173kEducation$135kCommunity Improvement$76kPhilanthropy$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $361k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS$28,000
THE BARNABAS NETWORK$25,000
SHIFT-ED$25,000
INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER$22,250
YOUTH FOCUS$22,000
CARING SERVICES$20,000
TURNING EVERYTHING AROUND$20,000
NEIGHBORHOOD MARKETS INC$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$20,000
NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUE$20,000
GUILFORD ADULT HEALTH INC$20,000
KELLIN FOUNDATION$20,000
GUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION$20,000
BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF GREENSBORO INC - FREEDOM SCHOOL$15,000
STEPUP$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CITY LIGHTS MINISTRY: $8k → 13%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE PIEDMONT: $2k → 16%CITY LIGHTS MINISTRY: $5k → 13%WHEELS4HOPE: $18k → 8%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF GREENSBORO INC - FREEDOM SCHOOL: $29k → 16%WHEELS4HOPE: $17k → 8%WHEELS4HOPE: $500 → 8%BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF GREENSBORO INC - FREEDOM SCHOOL: $23k → 16%INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER: $22k → 16%YOUTH FOCUS: $22k → 16%GUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF GREENSBORO INC - FREEDOM SCHOOL: $15k → 16%YOUTH FOCUS: $14k → 16%GUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER: $13k → 16%YOUTH FOCUS: $6k → 16%GUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%GUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%CARING SERVICES: $20k → 16%PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY COLLABERATION FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 16%PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS: $3k → 16%ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT: $20k → 16%ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT: $8k → 16%ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT: $5k → 16%ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT: $4k → 16%ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT: $2k → 16%KELLIN FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $43k → 16%THE BARNABAS NETWORK: $25k → 16%KELLIN FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $11k → 16%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $3k → 16%NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUE: $20k → 16%NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUE: $10k → 16%NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUE: $8k → 16%NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUE: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 80%.

David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 39 repeat orgs$297k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
25

Total granted

$1.4M
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+30%

Still filing today

69%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $107k · revenue +102%
  • AS
    A SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +889%
  • BC
    Black Child Development Institute of Greensboro Inc
    3× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue +209%
  • GS
    GRANT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
  • RC
    READING CONNECTIONS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
2
Womens Resource Center of Greensboro Inc

To promote the self-reliance of women by assessing needs, providing services, and acting as a gateway to community resources; to seek solutions for unmet needs by providing strategic leadership through collaboration and partnerships within…

Human Services
3
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
4
Hospitality House of Northwest North Carolina

To provide food and shelter for the homeless

Housing & Shelter
5
Good Samaritan Network of Hamilton County Inc

Our mission is to offer essential support, including nutritious food, warm clothing, secure shelter, financial assistance, valuable referrals, educational resources, and comprehensive life skills training to individuals in need. We bring…

Philanthropy
6
Durham Home Inc
—
7
Promise Resource Network Inc

Through the wisdom of lived recovery experience, we ignite social change, inspire hope and serve as a catalyst for personal greatness.

Health
8
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
9
Feed Your Neighbor Community Food Pantry Inc

To distribute emergency food assistance to individuals and families in the greenville area, and to cooperate with partnering agencies so that recipients have access to the greatest number of nutritional resources.

Food & Nutrition
10
Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services
11
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
12
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro Housing Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Break the Chain Kennel Kru Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
36/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Black Child Development Institute of Greensboro Inc: $67,000 · Human ServicesBlack Child Development Institute o…KELLIN FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesKELLIN FOUNDATIONBACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $57,400 · Human ServicesBACKPACK BEGINNINGSNEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE INC: $45,500 · Human ServicesNEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE INCYOUTH FOCUS INC: $41,986 · Human ServicesYOUTH FOCUS INCGUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION: $39,000 · Human ServicesGUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATIONAdult Center for Enrichment Inc: $38,500 · Human ServicesAdult Center for Enrichment IncTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $35,150 · Human ServicesTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INCWHEELS4HOPE: $35,000 · Human ServicesWHEELS4HOPETHE BARNABAS NETWORK: $25,000 · Human ServicesCARING SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS: $17,500 · Human Services+5 more: $42,700 · Human Services+5 moreOPERATION XCEL: $119,980 · OtherOPERATION XCELGUILFORD NONPROFIT CONSORTIUM: $73,750 · OtherGUILFORD NONPROFIT CONSORTIUMTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $52,800 · OtherTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECTYMCA OF GREENSBORO: $42,400 · OtherYMCA OF GREENSBOROTHE SPARROW'S NEST INC (BLACK SUIT INITIATIVE): $27,000 · OtherSTEPUP: $25,000 · OtherSHIFT EDUCATION: $27,500 · Other+38 more: $271,613 · Other+38 moreMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION: $87,500 · HealthMOSES H CON…GUILFORD ADULT HEALTH INC: $35,000 · HealthGUILFORD AD…PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…TURNING EVERYTHING AROUND: $20,000 · HealthTURNING EVE…FREEDOM HOUSE: $6,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthA SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $69,700 · Food & NutritionSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $44,800 · Food & NutritionOUT OF THE GARDEN PROJECT: $18,610 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC: $106,547 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD MARKETS INCORPORATED: $52,500 · Community ImprovementROCK & WRAP IT UP INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementANCHOR HOPE: $40,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$524,736Other$640,043Health$169,500Food & Nutrition$133,110Housing & Shelter$106,547Community Improvement$62,500Philanthropy$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC: $106,547 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION: $87,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $69,700 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetBlack Child Development Institute of Greensboro Inc: $67,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetKELLIN FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetBACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $57,400 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $52,800 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD MARKETS INCORPORATED: $52,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetNEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE INC: $45,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $44,800 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetYOUTH FOCUS INC: $41,986 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetANCHOR HOPE: $40,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetGUILFORD GREEN FOUNDATION: $39,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetAdult Center for Enrichment Inc: $38,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $35,150 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGUILFORD ADULT HEALTH INC: $35,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWHEELS4HOPE: $35,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSHIFT EDUCATION: $27,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BARNABAS NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPositive Direction for Youth and Families Inc: $21,250 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOUT OF THE GARDEN PROJECT: $18,610 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSPARROWS NEST INC: $18,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetPARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS: $17,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC: $14,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRED DOG FARM ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK: $13,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCITY LIGHTS MINISTRY: $12,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetREADING CONNECTIONS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBREAK THE CHAIN KENNEL KRU INC: $10,750 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $10,200 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetROCK & WRAP IT UP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLABORATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $8,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetProject Dignity of Western North Carolina Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFaithAction International House: $6,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHANDYCAPABLE NETWORK INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING EMPOWERMENT FOR ADULTS IN DICKSON COUNTY: $1,500 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for NC A&T State University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS FOR AN EARLIER BREAST CANCER TEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGO FAR Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Moses Cone - Wesley L…Tannenbaum-Sternberge…The Mary Lynn Richard…Lincoln Financial Fou…Weaver Foundation IncUnited Way of Greater…Amg Charitable Gift F…High Point Community …The Hummel Family Fun…Hillsdale FundReynolds American Fou…
Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro IncNC65.1× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Weaver Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · High Point Community Foundation · The Hummel Family Fund Inc · Hillsdale Fund · Reynolds American Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David and Claudia Babb Reich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home