Skip to content

· Private foundation

David & Cindy Pogrund Charities

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$92kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$24kEducation$12kInternational$6kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,425
JEIWSH LEARNING FOUNDATION$6,666
JEWISH UNITED FUND$6,400
THE ARK$1,800
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$1,800
NEW MOMS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
MAGEN DAVID ADOM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY LAW FUND$800
CHICAGO LOOP SYNAGOGUE$765
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$500
WFMT$365
SHALVA$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 4%NEW MOMS: $1k → 14%NEW MOMS: $1k → 14%NEW MOMS: $1k → 14%NEW MOMS: $500 → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100 → 14%SHALVA: $720 → 14%SHALVA: $360 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MD
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$171k · 32 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
42

Total granted

$171k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+47%

Still filing today

44%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +13%
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +52%
  • NM
    NEW MOMS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • J
    JUF
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • HF
    HERENDORF FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FOUND
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Council on Urban Affairs

The Jewish Council on Urban Affair's (JCUA) longstanding mission is to combat poverty, racism and antisemitism working in partnership with diverse communities. JCUA uses a community organizing model to engage the Jewish community in the…

Community Improvement
3
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
6
Chicago Chesed Fund

To raise and distribute funds, goods, food, and assistance to the poverty-stricken in the jewish community.

Human Services
7
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
9
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
10
One for Israel

One for israel's purposes are to unite u.s. and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the gospel in israel, to raise funds for evangelism and gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for israel's…

—
11
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
12
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Orot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
25/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $33,257 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ARK: $22,696 · OtherTHE ARKJEWISH LEARNING FOUNDATION: $18,633 · OtherJEWISH LEARNING FOUNDATIONJUF: $11,900 · OtherJUFISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $10,720 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCHERENDORF FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherHERENDORF FAMILY FOUNDATIONJEIWSH LEARNING FOUNDATION: $6,666 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,813 · Other+57 more: $47,050 · Other+57 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $36,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND…NEW MOMS INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $1,080 · Human ServicesTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesCHICAGO COALITION FOR FAMILY BUILDING: $3,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,400 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $660 · HealthTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $2,410 · EducationOrot: $500 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $380 · EducationAustin Special Chicago: $200 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,800 · Civil Rights
Other$166,735Philanthropy$36,500Human Services$5,680Health$5,060Education$3,540Arts & Culture$3,500Civil Rights$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $10,720 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION FOR FAMILY BUILDING: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $2,410 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $1,080 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $660 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $610 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrot: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Special Chicago: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION FOR FAMILY BUILDING ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David & Cindy Pogrund Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Cindy Pogrund Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David & Cindy Pogrund Charities?

    Find your warmest path to David & Cindy Pogrund Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David & Cindy Pogrund Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph