Skip to content

· Private foundation

David Altman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$172kAnimals$116kEducation$106kInternational$66kEnvironment$53kArts & Culture$48kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$888k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FANCONI ANEMIA RESEARCH FUND$12,000
VENICE ART CENTER$3,000
THE STARZ CENTER OF THE PERFORMING$3,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,046
UC FOUNDATION-MIND INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $50 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AR
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$572k · 48 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
12

Total granted

$572k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+40%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +23%
  • DZ
    DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +33%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -23%
  • OF
    OLIVER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UF
    UN FDN FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
The Florida Aquarium Inc

The florida aquarium's mission focuses on our shared purpose of a commitment to save marine wildlife, with a vision to be florida's leading conservation-based aquarium. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
8
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
11
Atlanta Fulton County Zoo Inc

Zoo atlanta's mission is to save wildlife and their habitats through research, conservation, education and engaging experiences. the zoo's efforts connect people to animals and inspire conservation action.

Animals
12
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Venice Art Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL LEAGUE OF AMERICAN PEN WOMEN: $45,000 · OtherNATIONAL LEAGUE OF AMERICAN PEN WOMENMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $26,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVERWORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $23,665 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUNDHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $20,404 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALJIM ALTMAN GUITAR SCHOLARSHIP: $20,000 · OtherJIM ALTMAN GUITAR SCHOLARSHIPTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $17,600 · OtherTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17,306 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYNATIONAL AUDOBON SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE: $12,000 · OtherSECOND WIND FUND INC: $11,000 · Other+32 more: $106,444 · Other+32 moreFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION: $98,000 · HealthFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATI…American Heart Association Inc: $12,945 · HealthAmerican Heart Associat…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,800 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESE…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLOGIC…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $20,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SO…DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $17,000 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRI…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $12,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLI…THE MAXFUND INC: $7,000 · AnimalsTHE MAXFUND INCTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $4,100 · Animals+1 more: $1,100 · AnimalsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,598 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $3,100 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,350 · InternationalVENICE ART CENTER: $15,700 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS OF ST PETERSBURG FLORIDA INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $4,108 · Arts & CultureMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $12,500 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human Services
Other$314,419Health$130,745Animals$87,200International$40,048Arts & Culture$30,308Philanthropy$25,000Human Services$12,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION: $98,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $17,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17,306 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE ART CENTER: $15,700 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,945 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,598 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS OF ST PETERSBURG FLORIDA INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $4,108 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $4,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDogs For Diabetics - dba National Institute of Canine Service and Training: $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds VENICE ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND WIND FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS OF ST PETERSBURG FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAXFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David Altman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David Altman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Altman’s filings →

More from the funding graph