Skip to content

· Private foundation

David a and Edith F Demar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$53kArts & Culture$45kPhilanthropy$44kHousing & Shelter$32kYouth Development$21kHuman Services$18kRecreation & Sports$15kHealth$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STREETWISE$20,000
JUF$10,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART CHICAGO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,360
THE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$3,000
JCC CHICAGO$1,000
MESULAM CENTER FOR COGNITIVE$1,000
SOAR$1,000
CAMP CHI$1,000
SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE$1,000
SPERTUS INSTITUTE$1,000
HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK$1,000
CJE SENIORLIFE$1,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,000
FRANCES W PARKER SCHOOL$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SELFHELP HOME: $300 → 14%SELFHELP HOME: $100 → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $6k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $3k → 14%CAMP CHI: $2k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $2k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $2k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $1k → 14%CAMP CHI: $1k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $1k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $1k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $500 → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $100 → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $100 → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $3k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $3k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $1k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $1k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $1k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of David a and Edith F Demar Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 91%.

David a and Edith F Demar Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 33 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$176k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

58%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthReligionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
    7× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +0%
  • JC
    Jewish Community Centers of Chicago
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +34%
  • Northwestern University
    7× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ARLINGTO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • F
    FUMCAH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
2
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
3
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
5
Students Run Chicago
Health
6
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Humanities Festival

To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
8
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
9
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
10
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
11
Cedille Chicago Nfp

Cedille Chicago, NFP is devoted to the activity of producing and marketing recordings of classical music by Chicago-area musicians and composers.

Arts & Culture
12
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grant Park Orchestral Association; the most unlike its peers is The Clare Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STREETWISE: $26,000 · OtherSTREETWISECHICAGO SINAI CONGREGATION: $17,925 · OtherCHICAGO SINAI CONGREGATIONFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF AR: $11,750 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ARJUF: $10,000 · OtherJUFUNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ARLINGTO: $10,000 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ARLINGTOCNADC: $6,700 · OtherCNADCSPERTUS INSTITUTE: $4,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,360 · Other+29 more: $24,850 · Other+29 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $43,700 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION O…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $28,975 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMP…Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $3,850 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony …SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN: $3,500 · Arts & CultureSPECIAL GIFTS THE…SOUNDS GOOD CHOIR NFP: $2,100 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $1,675 · Arts & CultureJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $15,750 · Human ServicesJewish Commun…COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $10,250 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR J…HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $2,700 · Human ServicesHUNGER RESOUR…+1 more: $400 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $15,100 · Recreation & SportsTHE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $200 · Housing & ShelterFrancis W Parker School: $2,400 · Education
Other$115,985Philanthropy$43,700Arts & Culture$40,100Human Services$29,100Recreation & Sports$15,100Housing & Shelter$6,200Education$2,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $43,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $28,975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $15,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $15,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $10,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $3,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN: $3,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $2,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $2,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUNDS GOOD CHOIR NFP: $2,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETERVILLE ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVE RESIDENTS: $900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOL: $875 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStorycatchers: $575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SELFHELP HOME INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR VASCULAR MEDICINE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds STREETWISE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Centers of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds THE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL GIFTS THEATRE INC CO ELISE LARSEN ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds SOUNDS GOOD CHOIR NFP ↗
  • Who funds THE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Support Our Aging Religious Inc ↗
  • Who funds STREETERVILLE ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVE RESIDENTS ↗
  • Who funds WARREN W CHERRY PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Storycatchers ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL20.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David a and Edith F Demar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David a and Edith F Demar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David a and Edith F Demar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph