Skip to content

· Private foundation

DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$299k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$390kInternational$363kFood & Nutrition$245kReligion$210kHealth$150kHuman Services$98kCrime & Legal$90kRecreation & Sports$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $256k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$313k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Long Island Lutheran High School$30,000
Interfaith Nutrition Network$25,000
The Life Lutheran Church$20,000
Long Island Alzheimers Foundation$15,000
Covenant House$15,000
The Society of StVincent dePaul$15,000
Native American Heritage Association$15,000
Water Missions International$15,000
Williamson College of the Trades$15,000
Disabled American Veterans Charitable Service Trus$11,000
Save the Children$10,000
Food for The Poor Inc$10,000
Inclusive Sports and Fitness Inc$10,000
StJosephs RC Church Shepherd Table SK$10,000
City Harvest Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Canine Partners for Life: $5k → 6%Charity Navigator: $1k → 7%Canine Partners for Life: $5k → 6%Charity Navigator: $1k → 7%Canine Partners for Life: $5k → 6%Charity Navigator: $1k → 7%Canine Partners for Life: $5k → 6%Charity Navigator: $1k → 7%Canine Partners for Life: $5k → 6%Charity Navigator: $1k → 7%Canine Partners for Life: $5k → 6%Covenant House: $15k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
SC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 32 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
1

Total granted

$1.8M
$20k

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +79%
  • NA
    Native American Heritage Association
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +53%
  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Charlotte CountyEnglewood
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
6
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
9
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
10
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
11
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inclusive Sports and Fitness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Long Island Lutheran High School: $180,000 · OtherLong Island Lutheran High SchoolThe Life Lutheran Church: $80,000 · OtherThe Life Lutheran ChurchST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOLGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $60,000 · OtherGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INCStJosephs RC Church Shepherd Table SK: $60,000 · OtherStJosephs RC Church Shepherd Table SKTHE SALVATION ARMY: $37,500 · OtherLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US: $30,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherThe Society of StVincent dePaul: $30,000 · OtherINCLUSIVE SPORTS AND FITNESS INC: $75,000 · OtherINCLUSIVE SPORTS AND FITNESS INCDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust: $66,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Serv…+4 more: $68,000 · Other+4 moreWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $90,000 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATION…DIRECT RELIEF: $62,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $60,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $60,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federati…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $55,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES U…MAP International Inc: $35,000 · InternationalMAP International IncCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $30,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUNDAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC: $125,000 · Food & NutritionTHE INTERFA…CITY HARVEST INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVES…WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $100,000 · EducationWILLIAMSO…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationFOLDS OF …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN S…COVENANT HOUSE: $65,000 · Human ServicesCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $30,000 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $5,000 · Human ServicesNative American Heritage Association: $90,000 · Crime & LegalLong Island Alzheimers and Dementia Center Inc: $90,000 · Health
Other$776,500International$422,500Food & Nutrition$185,000Education$150,000Human Services$100,000Crime & Legal$90,000Health$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC: $125,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $100,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Heritage Association: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLong Island Alzheimers and Dementia Center Inc: $90,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetINCLUSIVE SPORTS AND FITNESS INC: $75,000 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust: $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $62,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENGin: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLIFETIDES INSTITUTE: $18,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetCharity Navigator: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
  • Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Alzheimers and Dementia Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds INCLUSIVE SPORTS AND FITNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENGin ↗
  • Who funds LIFETIDES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L?

Find your warmest path to DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L’s filings →

More from the funding graph