Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$299k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
29
Grants FY2025
30
Organizations funded FY2024
3%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
28 to 30
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
12
Total assets, FY2025
$313k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 3% of the organizations DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving29$299k0%
FY202430$303k3%
FY202330$313k10%
FY202228$300k4%
FY202128$300k0%
FY202028$300kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$390kInternational$363kFood & Nutrition$245kReligion$210kHealth$150kHuman Services$98kCrime & Legal$90kRecreation & Sports$75kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
SC
OK
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Interfaith Nutrition Network Inc$125,00060%
Williamson College of the Trades$100,00060%
Native American Heritage Association$90,00060%
Water Missions International$90,00060%
Long Island Alzheimers and Dementia Center Inc$90,00061%
Inclusive Sports and Fitness Inc$75,00068%
Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust$66,00060%
Covenant House$65,00060%
Direct Relief$62,50060%
St Josephs Indian School$60,0006n/a
City Harvest Inc$60,00060%
Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind Inc$60,00060%
Food for the Poor Inc$60,00060%
Save The Children Federation Inc$60,00060%
Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc$55,00060%
The Salvation Army$37,5006n/a
MAP International Inc$35,00060%
Canine Partners for Life$30,00060%
Children's Hunger Fund$30,00060%
Americares Foundation Inc$30,00060%
Lutheran Association of Missionaries and Pilots US$30,00030%
Fisher House Foundation Inc$30,00060%
Folds of Honor Foundation$30,00060%
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation$20,00020%
ENGin$20,00031%
Lifetides Institute$18,000610%
Charity Navigator$5,00050%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($380k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Interfaith Nutrition Network Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWilliamson College of the Trades: $100,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Heritage Association: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWater Missions International: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLong Island Alzheimers and Dementia Center Inc: $90,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetInclusive Sports and Fitness Inc: $75,000 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust: $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCovenant House: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDirect Relief: $62,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCity Harvest Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGuide Dog Foundation for the Blind Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFood for the Poor Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCanine Partners for Life: $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hunger Fund: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmericares Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLutheran Association of Missionaries and Pilots US: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFisher House Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFolds of Honor Foundation: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENGin: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLifetides Institute: $18,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetCharity Navigator: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 25.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L?

Find your warmest path to DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L

How much does DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L give?
DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L reported 29 grants totaling $299,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 28 and 30 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (21%), International (20%), Food & Nutrition (14%).
Who are DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: The Interfaith Nutrition Network Inc ($125k), Williamson College of the Trades ($100k), Native American Heritage Association ($90k).
Does DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 3% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L based?
DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on DAPHNE SEYBOLT CULPEPER FOUNDATION INC ATTN WILLIAM GHRISKEY c/o Ingalls & Snyder L’s filings →

More from the funding graph