Skip to content
Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd at a glance

· Private foundation

Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$558kArts & Culture$458kHuman Services$164kHealth$163kCivil Rights$161kPhilanthropy$75kEnvironment$55kEmployment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK$25,000
INTER-RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZAT$10,000
FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
WOMENS INSTITUTE FOR SOLIDARITY AND EMPOWERMENT$6,000
WOMENS INSTITUTE FOR SOLIDARITY AND EMPOWERMENT$5,500
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$3,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF SEATTLE$500
DESERT ROOTS RISING STARS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($1.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($257k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $223k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%MISSION TO END MODERN SLAVERY INC: $5k → 13%HOLLABACK: $5k → 20%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%CHILD FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FILIPINO CONCERNS: $25k → 10%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FILIPINO CONCERNS: $5k → 10%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $3k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
HI
OK
TX

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($257k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Philippines$257k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltdlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 8 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
63

Total granted

$198k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+17%

Still filing today

50%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    Filipino-American Development Foundation
    2× · 2021–2025 · $145k · revenue +128%
  • AC
    Avery Coonley School
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +17%
  • SA
    SEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IM
    ILLINOIS MATH AND SCIENCE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $302k
  • FC
    FERNANDO C AMORSOLO ART FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $257k
  • CU
    CORNELL UNIVERSIY
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
2
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
5
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
6
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
7
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
8
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Asian Pacific Environmental Network

APEN builds immigrant and refugee power for a just transition with local roots and statewide impact so all people can live, work, learn, play and thrive in a clean and healthy environment.

Environment
11
Perigee Fund

Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood. perigee is organized & operated as a…

Health
12
Washington Progress Fund

Washington Progress Fund is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington state supported by a network of committed donors. WPF envisions a Washington state where government serves the public interest and we all…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Avery Coonley School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
35/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLINOIS MATH AND SCIENCE ACADEMY: $301,500 · OtherILLINOIS MATH AND SCIENCE ACADEMYFERNANDO C AMORSOLO ART FOUNDATION INC: $257,330 · OtherFERNANDO C AMORSOLO ART FOUNDATION INCCORNELL UNIVERSIY: $200,000 · OtherCORNELL UNIVERSIYSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST: $50,000 · Other+35 more: $203,793 · Other+35 moreFilipino-American Development Foundation: $145,000 · Human ServicesFilipino-Americ…NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FILIPINO CONCERNS: $30,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIAN…FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $25,000 · Human ServicesFILIPINO ADVOCA…+6 more: $30,000 · Human Services+6 moreFILIPINO AMERICAN NATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $65,000 · Arts & CultureFILIPINO AM…Manilatown Heritage Foundation: $25,000 · Arts & CultureManilatown …ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDI…Brava for Women in the Arts dba Brava Theater Center: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBrava for W…NORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST F…SEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $22,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreROSEMAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $100,000 · EducationROSEMAN U…THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EducationTHE UNIVE…RAINIER SCHOLARS: $5,000 · EducationSawhorse Revolution: $5,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 · EducationHAWAII WORKERS CENTER: $5,000 · Education+5 more: $12,500 · Education+5 morePILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $25,000 · Community ImprovementASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK: $25,000 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE EMPLOYEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OPTUM WASHINGTON: $2,750 · PhilanthropySEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $25,000 · HealthWA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthGLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $5,000 · Health
Other$1,012,623Human Services$230,000Arts & Culture$173,000Education$145,000Community Improvement$60,000Philanthropy$52,750Health$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFilipino-American Development Foundation: $145,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetROSEMAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetManilatown Heritage Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGot Green: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrava for Women in the Arts dba Brava Theater Center: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRVC SEATTLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAvery Coonley School: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE'S FUND: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIGHT TO BE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSawhorse Revolution: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Alliance for Alternative Media&Education: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetChild Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII WORKERS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFilipino Migrant Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EMPLOYEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OPTUM WASHINGTON: $2,750 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EVERGREEN SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMusic Center of the Northwest: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEVADA PUBLIC RADIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationInatai FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Raikes FoundationThe Satterberg Founda…NEO Philanthropy IncSocial Justice Fund N…Marguerite Casey Foun…The Robert Wood Johns…Proteus Fund IncCommon Counsel Founda…The Norcliffe Foundat…
Seattle FoundationWA23.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Raikes Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Social Justice Fund Northwest · Marguerite Casey Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Foundation for Philippine Progress: 43% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd?

Find your warmest path to Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Danilo Soriano Family Foundation Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home