· Private foundation
Daniels Family Foundation Leslie B Daniels Trustee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $112k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $194k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS | $25,000 |
| PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING | $25,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| THE CHAPIN SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| BRUNSWICK SCHOOL | $12,000 |
| GREENWICH ACADEMY | $12,000 |
| GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| STAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE BLIND BROOK FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA | $10,000 |
| FONKOZE USA | $10,000 |
| PUTNAM INDIAN FIELD SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $6,070 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC7× · 2019–2025 · $152k · revenue +34%
- FUFONKOZE USA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +59%
DUKE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- TMTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +64%
- CRCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -15%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINAone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds FONKOZE USA INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds THE PUTNAM INDIAN FIELD SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Glades Academy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds GRANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds SILVER SHIELD ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PALM BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach Civic Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HANDS TOGETHER FOR HAITIANS INC ↗
- Who funds BLIND BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH POLICE SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds PESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS-ON-WHEELS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Laura M and Peter T Grauer Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The New York Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Ford Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daniels Family Foundation Leslie B Daniels Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Refugee Assistance Alliance Inc — 92% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Palm Beach Symphony Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Day Academy Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Daniels Family Foundation Leslie B Daniels Trustee?
Find your warmest path to Daniels Family Foundation Leslie B Daniels Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.