Skip to content
Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc

The foundation specifically aims to empower young adults to pursue a lifelong engagement in communal activities and volunteer opportunities and to identify and support programs that promote acts of kindness in the community.

$268k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$150kEducation$135kHealth$125kInternational$120kReligion$118kPublic Safety & Disaster$39kEmployment$32kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$677k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES ON NEW YORKINC$150,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
WESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BELEV ECHAD: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 62%.

Daniella Moffson Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
7
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Vaad Hapula Inc

Support jewry in Israel

Religion
10
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of United Hatzalah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Beit Medrash of Great Neck Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $120,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL C…Neve Michael Childrens Village Inc: $50,000 · InternationalNeve Michael Childrens Village IncAMIT CHILDREN INC: $49,500 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMRAMAZ SCHOOL: $125,000 · OtherRAMAZ SCHOOLCOLEL CHABAD: $20,000 · OtherCOLEL CHABADSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INC: $18,522 · OtherSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INCWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC: $18,000 · OtherWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC+2 more: $5,730 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FED…SHABBAT ANGELS INC: $10,558 · PhilanthropySHABBAT ANGELS INC+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBEIT MEDRASH OF GREAT NECK INC: $54,000 · ReligionBEIT MEDRASH OF GR…FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL INC: $32,000 · ReligionFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE …ZAKA NORTH INC: $20,000 · ReligionZAKA NORTH INCThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc: $20,000 · ReligionThe Chaya-Israel F…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTIKVA CORP: $10,000 · EducationBELEV ECHAD INC: $5,000 · Human Services
International$239,500Other$187,252Philanthropy$165,558Religion$126,000Arts & Culture$20,000Education$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $120,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNeve Michael Childrens Village Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $49,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL INC: $32,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSHABBAT ANGELS INC: $10,558 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTH KIDS INC dba TOYS FOR HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY22.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniella Moffson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home