Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel Madison Floyd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$455k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.8MPhilanthropy$611kCivil Rights$277kHuman Services$128kInternational$94kHousing & Shelter$65kEducation$23kRecreation & Sports$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
$14,400
Median grant
9
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY OF CHRIST INTERNATIONAL$108,000
OPERATION MOBILIZATION$90,000
MODERN DAY MISSIONS$36,000
CLAYTON KING MINISTRIES$32,000
GREENWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH$20,000
PSALM 91 AT THE POTTERS PLACE$18,000
CHRIS DEW MINISTRIES$16,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CENTRAL MISSIONARY CLEARINGHOUSE$14,400
GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH$12,000
THE KING'S ACADEMY$12,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$12,000
ORPHAN HELPERS$12,000
LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FLORENCE SC$12,000
TENACIOUS GRACE MINISTRIES$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOUSE OF HOPE OF THE PEE DEE: $15k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
OH
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Daniel Madison Floyd Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in SC; by stated purpose, 57%.

Daniel Madison Floyd Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$531k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -58% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$3.0M
$388k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-58%

Still filing today

62%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    CLAYTON KING MINISTRIES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $386k · revenue +252% · 26% of their budget
  • CD
    CHRIS DEW MINISTRIES
    6× · 2018–2025 · $214k · revenue +12%
  • OH
    ORPHAN HELPERSINC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $97k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • OM
    OPERATION MOBILIZATION SHIPS
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • OM
    OPERATION MOBILIZATION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $80k
  • MI
    MURRELLS INLET FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Christian Ministries International

Ministries

Religion
2
Crosspointe Ministries

Promote the gospel of jesus christ through bible study and conferences

Religion
3
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
4
House of Hope Ministry Inc

Church organization

Religion
5
Puzzle Piece Ministries

To deliver the message of Jesus

Religion
6
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
7
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
8
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
9
Point Ministries Inc

Point Ministries is a Christian Bible teaching ministry founded by Dr. Daryl Jones. We exist to glorify God by providing sound Christian biblical teaching through Christian Media to make and equip disciples of Jesus Christ to impact the…

Religion
10
Teaching Ministry of the Word of Truth

A training ministry that equips the saints more focusing on preparing leaders and ministers of the word for the work of ministry to the building up of the body of Christ.

Religion
11
Living Hope Christian Ministry Inc

To teach, preach, proclaim, publish, distribute and disseminate the gospel and doctrine of the christian faith. the ministry reaches approximately 1.5 million persons through its outreach ministries.

Religion
12
Christian Ministries International
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Modern Day Missions; the most unlike its peers is The Hope Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Various 501 C3 and Religious Organizations per List attached: $1,014,462 · OtherVarious 501 C3 and Religious Organizations per List attachedNEWSPRING CHURCH INC: $415,000 · OtherNEWSPRING CHURCH INCOPERATION MOBILIZATION: $266,900 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATIONCHRIS DEW MINISTRIES: $214,000 · OtherCHRIS DEW MINISTRIESFAMILY OF CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $108,000 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATION SHIPS: $100,000 · Other+25 more: $535,265 · Other+25 moreCLAYTON KING MINISTRIES: $386,000 · ReligionCLAYTON KING MINISTR…MODERN DAY MISSIONS: $78,000 · ReligionMODERN DAY MISSIONSPSALM 91 AT THE POTTERS PLACE: $65,500 · ReligionPSALM 91 AT THE POTT…TENACIOUS GRACE MINISTRIES INC: $48,000 · ReligionTENACIOUS GRACE MINI…Lifestone Ministries Inc: $30,000 · ReligionLEADERSHIP MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE: $25,000 · ReligionHOUSE OF HOPE OF THE PEE DEE INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FLORENCE: $37,000 · Human ServicesORPHAN HELPERSINC: $97,000 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLARENDON CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER: $14,700 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,653,627Religion$632,500Human Services$102,000International$97,000Youth Development$35,000Crime & Legal$14,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLAYTON KING MINISTRIES: $386,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetCHRIS DEW MINISTRIES: $214,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetORPHAN HELPERSINC: $97,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $78,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPSALM 91 AT THE POTTERS PLACE: $65,500 over 5y, 12% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE OF THE PEE DEE INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $63,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTENACIOUS GRACE MINISTRIES INC: $48,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FLORENCE: $37,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLifestone Ministries Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE: $25,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCLARENDON CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER: $14,700 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetRENEWING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLAYTON KING MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRIS DEW MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN HELPERSINC ↗
  • Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds PSALM 91 AT THE POTTERS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE OF THE PEE DEE INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds TENACIOUS GRACE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FLORENCE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Lifestone Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CLARENDON CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel Madison Floyd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel Madison Floyd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel Madison Floyd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph