Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Daniel J Reid Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$201kHuman Services$190kEducation$146kHealth$108kArts & Culture$49kReligion$21kCommunity Improvement$18kPhilanthropy$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPERVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$22,356
WISHBONE PET RESCUE ALLIANCE INC$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$14,000
I HEART ANIMAL RESCUE$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$9,000
DESIS DEN SENIOR SANCTUARY$8,000
NAPERVILLER RIVERWALK FOUNDATION$5,200
ST PETER'S UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$5,000
SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS$5,000
COBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,478
ALAN MADDEN FOUNDATION$4,000
ALL SEATED IN A BARN$4,000
RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES$4,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MARION COUNTY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMILY'S HOPE: $5k → 9%ALAN MADDEN FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%HELP AGENCY OF THE FORESTS: $8k → 16%HELP AGENCY OF THE FORESTS: $6k → 16%HELP AGENCY OF THE FORESTS: $5k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA: $22k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA: $22k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA: $20k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA: $13k → 13%DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE: $1k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA: $10k → 13%DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE: $1k → 10%DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE: $1k → 10%DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE: $1k → 10%DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE: $1k → 10%DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
SD
IA
IN
OH
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$674k · 23 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
16

Total granted

$674k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

61%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    Naperville Education Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +7%
  • IH
    I HEART ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +3%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • NN
    NAPERVILLE N HIGH SCH BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +21%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
2
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

3
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
6
Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.

Human Services
7
The Saratoga Hospital

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
8
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
9
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
10
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
11
Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation

The mission of Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation (The Foundation) is to support the activities and mission of the Hospital (CHA).

Health
12
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Marietta Welcome Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPublic University Foundatio…Community Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public School District Foun…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Rotary Club FoundationsCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DESIS DEN SENIOR SANCTUARY — $48,000 · OtherDESIS DEN SENIOR SANCTUARYCHILDREN FIRST ON LAKESHORE — $35,000 · OtherCHILDREN FIRST ON LAKESHORERONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES — $21,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD CHARITIESRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $17,510 · OtherRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $15,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY — $14,813 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYNAPERVILLE N HIGH SCH BOOSTER CLUB — $14,250 · OtherNAPERVILLE N HIGH SCH BOOSTER CLUBST ROBERT BELLARMINE SCHOOL — $12,300 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC — $11,207 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+12 more — $41,950 · Other+12 moreWISHBONE PET RESCUE ALLIANCE — $76,013 · AnimalsWISHBONE PET RESCUE AL…I HEART ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $62,000 · AnimalsI HEART ANIMAL RESCUE …ABANDONED PET RESCUE INC — $12,606 · AnimalsABANDONED PET RESCUE I…Humane Society of Marion County Inc — $6,000 · Animals+1 more — $4,000 · AnimalsCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC — $87,289 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE FL…HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC — $19,000 · Human ServicesHELP AGENCY OF TH…DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE — $6,000 · Human ServicesEmilys Hope — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesNaperville Education Foundation — $70,656 · EducationNaperville Educa…University of Arizona Foundation — $14,000 · EducationUniversity of Ar…KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $10,117 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA GAMM…North Central College — $9,250 · EducationNorth Central Co…GLEASON LAKE ELEMENTARY PTO INC — $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $5,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $48,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $24,276 · HealthTHE SHRINE…The Devereux Foundation — $3,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $45,896 · Arts & CultureCOBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $11,504 · Arts & CultureMarietta Welcome Center Inc — $18,003 · Community Improvement
Other$251,730Animals$160,619Human Services$121,289Education$114,023Health$77,276Arts & Culture$57,400Community Improvement$18,003

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC — $87,289 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWISHBONE PET RESCUE ALLIANCE — $76,013 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetNaperville Education Foundation — $70,656 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetI HEART ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $62,000 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $45,896 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $24,276 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC — $19,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMarietta Welcome Center Inc — $18,003 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABANDONED PET RESCUE INC — $12,606 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $11,504 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $11,207 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $10,117 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNorth Central College — $9,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SAUGATUCK DOUGLAS — $7,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHumane Society of Marion County Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEmilys Hope — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLEASON LAKE ELEMENTARY PTO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Alan Madden Foundation — $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBTB FOUNDATION — $3,750 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSTAR FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPERVILLE RESPONDS FOR OUR VETERANS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds WISHBONE PET RESCUE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Naperville Education Foundation
  • Who funds I HEART ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC
  • Who funds Marietta Welcome Center Inc
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds ABANDONED PET RESCUE INC
  • Who funds COBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds North Central College
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF SAUGATUCK DOUGLAS
  • Who funds Humane Society of Marion County Inc
  • Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK LAKESHORE
  • Who funds Emilys Hope
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GLEASON LAKE ELEMENTARY PTO INC
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds ALL SEATED IN A BARN
  • Who funds The Alan Madden Foundation
  • Who funds BTB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Devereux Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Daniel J Reid Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Covenant House Florida Inc1% of income from government
  • Humane Society of Marion County Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph