Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Daniel and Janet Hidding Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$69kFood & Nutrition$51kHousing & Shelter$45kYouth Development$39kHealth$24kEnvironment$17kPhilanthropy$11kEducation$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$865k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PADS OF ELGIN$5,800
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB DUNDEE TOWNSHIP$5,800
FISH FOOD PANTRY$5,800
WING PROGRAM INC$5,800
SANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST$5,000
FOOD DEPOT$2,500
MUSEUM OF NM FOUNDATION$2,500
NEW MEXICO PBS$2,000
ST ELIZABETH SHELTER$2,000
WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
KITCHEN ANGELS$1,500
CANCER FOUNDATION OF NM$1,250
LIFE CIRCLE$1,000
SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%FOOD DEPOT: $3k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $3k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $3k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%REEL FATHERS: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
AZ
NM
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$231k · 25 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
21

Total granted

$231k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +61%
  • WP
    WINGS PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +88%
  • FF
    FISH FOOD PANTRY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • DF
    D300 Food Pantrygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +201%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Juan Regional Medical Center

Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care

Health
2
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
7
Flagstaff Medical Center

Improving health, healing people.

Health
8
Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block Inc

The tucson museum of art and historic block connects art to life through meaningful and engaging experiences that inspire discovery, spark creativity, and promote cultural understanding.

Arts & Culture
9
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
10
Presbyterian Healthcare Services

Presbyterian exists to ensure all of the patients, members and communities we serve can achieve their best health.

Health
11
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youthworks and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHomeless Services & ShelterLand Conservation Organizat…Food Pantries & AssistanceYouth Development CentersSenior Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
24/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM — $27,000 · OtherWHEELWRIGHT MUSEUMMUSEUM OF NM FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF NM FOUNDATIONKITCHEN ANGELS INC — $6,500 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS INCCANCER FOUNDATION OF NM — $5,750 · OtherCANCER FOUNDATION OF NMNEW MEXICO PBS — $5,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $4,000 · OtherTHE FOOD DEPOT — $10,500 · OtherTHE FOOD DEPOTSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $11,100 · OtherSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $4,000 · Other+16 more — $19,650 · Other+16 moreWINGS PROGRAM INC — $26,550 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INCPADS OF ELGIN INC — $12,050 · Housing & ShelterPADS OF ELGIN INCSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION — $6,500 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ELIZABETH SH…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP — $33,550 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…YOUTHWORKS — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHWORKSFISH FOOD PANTRY — $26,550 · Food & NutritionFISH FOOD PAN…D300 Food Pantry — $7,000 · Food & NutritionD300 Food Pan…+1 more — $500 · Food & NutritionTHE HEARD MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HEARD…Museum of Northern Arizona Inc — $8,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of…THE COUSE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COUSE…GICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC — $1,550 · Arts & CultureGICHIGAMI…WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $1,500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO…+2 more — $400 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST — $17,000 · EnvironmentSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $4,000 · HealthLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $4,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital — $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $2,000 · HealthLife Circle — $1,000 · Health
Other$107,750Housing & Shelter$45,100Youth Development$36,050Food & Nutrition$34,050Arts & Culture$23,450Environment$17,000Health$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP — $33,550 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC — $26,550 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFISH FOOD PANTRY — $26,550 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST — $17,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPADS OF ELGIN INC — $12,050 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $11,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Northern Arizona Inc — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetD300 Food Pantry — $7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION — $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHWORKS — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUSE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC — $1,550 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREEL FATHERS LTD — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds FISH FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds SANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST
  • Who funds PADS OF ELGIN INC
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT
  • Who funds THE HEARD MUSEUM
  • Who funds Museum of Northern Arizona Inc
  • Who funds D300 Food Pantry
  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital
  • Who funds YOUTHWORKS
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital
  • Who funds THE COUSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds GICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds Life Circle
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · The Frost Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation · Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc · The Ark Foundation · Jonathan & Kathleen Altman Fndtn · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Lineberry Foundation · Brindle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Daniel and Janet Hidding Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Daniel and Janet Hidding Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Daniel and Janet Hidding Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph