Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dan Kirkland Wells Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$518kReligion$244kArts & Culture$114kHealth$28kRecreation & Sports$11kCommunity Improvement$10kAnimals$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $87k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLIFTON CHURCH OF CHRIST$87,050
FREED HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY$26,500
FARA$15,000
ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS$10,000
BOSQUE MUSEUM$10,000
SCHREINER UNIVERSITY$10,000
KAA$8,000
CENTER FOR PURSUIT$5,000
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIV$5,000
LEAH DEMAREE DOUGLAS IMAGINATON FOU$2,500
CAMP JOHN MARC$1,800
BOSQUE ARTS CENTER$1,000
MT MORIAH CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$1,000
CAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RESEARCH IN$500
BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATIO$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $15k → 16%THE ONE PROJECT INC: $200 → 15%CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $5k → 16%CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
PA
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$949k · 17 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
27

Total granted

$949k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+12%

Still filing today

47%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $407k · revenue +33%
  • BOSQUE MUSEUM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $73k · revenue +26%
  • SU
    Schreiner University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $56k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROGERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE CORPORATI
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARTHA CATHOLIC SCHOOL LIBRARY F
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CM
    CLIFTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
2
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
3
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
4
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
5
Baylor College of Medicine

Baylor college of medicine (bcm) is committed to advancing human health through the integration of patient care, research, education, and community services.

Education
6
Hardin-Simmons University

The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.

Education
7
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
8
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
9
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
The Christ College of Nursing & Health Sciences

The christ college of nursing and health sciences, guided by its core values and enriched by a foundation in the arts and sciences, prepares individuals both for delivery of healthcare that promotes the well-being of a dynamic society and…

Education
11
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Schreiner University; the most unlike its peers is One Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $406,500 · EducationFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITYSchreiner University: $56,000 · EducationSchreiner UniversityST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $21,000 · Education+3 more: $2,715 · EducationCLIFTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $226,640 · OtherCLIFTON CHURCH OF CHRISTFARA: $65,000 · OtherFARAABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYKAA: $16,000 · Other+30 more: $56,100 · Other+30 moreBOSQUE MUSEUM: $73,300 · Arts & CultureBOSQUE MUSE…BOSQUE ARTS CENTER: $27,900 · Arts & CultureBOSQUE ARTS…THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesCLIFTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $3,500 · ReligionSTANDING WITH HOPE INC: $500 · ReligionTHOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 · HealthBOSQUE SPAY NEUTER INC: $1,000 · AnimalsCARE FOR CATS: $250 · AnimalsSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $200 · AnimalsTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $200 · International
Education$486,215Other$388,740Arts & Culture$101,200Human Services$25,200Religion$4,000Health$2,700Animals$1,450International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $406,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOSQUE MUSEUM: $73,300 over 5y, 13% of budgetSchreiner University: $56,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOSQUE ARTS CENTER: $27,900 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,015 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSQUE SPAY NEUTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANDING WITH HOPE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOSQUE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Schreiner University ↗
  • Who funds BOSQUE ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CLIFTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOSQUE SPAY NEUTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STANDING WITH HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOR CATS ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL9.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dan Kirkland Wells Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dan Kirkland Wells Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dan Kirkland Wells’ filings →

    More from the funding graph