Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Dallas Theological Seminary

The mission of Dallas Theological Seminary is to glorify God by equipping godly servant-leaders for the proclamation of His Word and the building up of the body of Christ worldwide.

$7.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$28k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

70% of Dallas Theological Seminary’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Dallas Seminary Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Dallas Theological Seminary named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $94k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
17
2
19
1
20
3
21
2
22
2
23
7
24
3
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$441kEducation$213kInternational$33kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $94,287 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,703,534 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,609,247 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$156M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chosen People Ministries$27,500
Inspire Women$20,000
Center for Women in Leadership$15,070
Feed My Starving Children$10,000
Peace International$7,622
WorldVenture$7,145
Evangelical Press Assoc$6,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Peace International: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
CO
AZ
AR
NC
SC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $1.9M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $371k to organizations and $1.6M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$748k · 39% · 1 grant · 42 people

Stated purpose: General Support · Tuition discount

East Asia and the Pacific$363k · 19% · 108 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$237k · 12% · 44 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

South America$195k · 10% · 81 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

Middle East and North Africa$118k · 6% · 14 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

Central America and the Caribbean$97k · 5% · 31 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

North America (Canada and Mexico)$94k · 5% · 39 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

South Asia$79k · 4% · 10 people

Stated purpose: Tuition discount

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of Dallas Theological Seminary’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Dallas Theological Seminarylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

5
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion
6
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Church Dynamics International

Serving and empowering pastors and church leaders to equip healthy and dynamic churches globally by using the corporates strategies and training

9
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
10
Dallas Theological Seminary

The mission of Dallas Theological Seminary is to glorify God by equipping godly servant-leaders for the proclamation of His Word and the building up of the body of Christ worldwide.

Education
11
Inspire Experiences Corporation

The Organization is a cooperative undertaking by churches with shared doctrinal beliefs to lead people to become fully devoted followers of Christ by inspiring Christ-centered Bible exploration and experiences.

Religion
12
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Leadership Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Peace International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHOSEN PEOPLE MINISTRIES INC — $192,500 · OtherCHOSEN PEOPLE MINISTRIES INCSIM USA INCORPORATED — $45,000 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATEDUnited World Missions — $25,000 · OtherUnited World MissionsCHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE — $14,000 · Other+2 more — $14,645 · OtherDallas Seminary Foundation — $140,000 · EducationDallas Seminary FoundationINSPIRE WOMEN — $30,000 · EducationINSPIRE WOMENThe New York City Leadership Center Inc — $20,000 · EducationThe New York City Leadership C…MOVEMENT DAY GREATER DALLAS DBA MOVEMENT DFW — $100,000 · ReligionMOVEMENT DAY GREAT…CENTER FOR WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP — $15,070 · ReligionCENTER FOR WOMEN I…ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · PhilanthropyILLUMINAT…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $22,579 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $10,000 · InternationalPEACE INTERNATIONAL — $7,622 · Human ServicesEVANGELICAL PRESS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,950 · Arts & Culture
Other$291,145Education$190,000Religion$115,070Philanthropy$60,000International$32,579Human Services$7,622Arts & Culture$6,950

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDallas Seminary Foundation — $140,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIRE WOMEN — $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $22,579 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe New York City Leadership Center Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP — $15,070 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE — $14,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE INTERNATIONAL — $7,622 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEVANGELICAL PRESS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,950 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dallas Theological Seminary funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph