Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dale and Alyce Sheely Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$968k
Granted FY2025still arriving
166
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$616kHuman Services$395kFood & Nutrition$140kHealth$103kHousing & Shelter$100kPhilanthropy$100kArts & Culture$36kAnimals$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 166 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k157 grants · $168k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $750k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORHOOD DEGREE$150,000
RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY$100,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CTR$100,000
THE BRIGHTSIDE PROJECT$100,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$100,000
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$100,000
SOUTH RANGE COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY$30,000
URSULINE SISTERS OF YOUNGSTOWN$20,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
ST PAULS LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE$2,000
GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
NEW LIFE ASSEMBLY OF GOD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEIGHBORHOOD DEGREE: $150k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
PA
CA
NE
VA
NC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$838k · 154 repeat orgs$680k to everyone else

154 repeat relationships: 144 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

154
34

Total granted

$838k
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

1%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $515k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $136k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $136k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    3× · 2022–2025 · $12k

Funded once

  • AC
    AKRON CHILDRENS MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue 0%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue 0%
  • RM
    RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
God's Light in the Darkness Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Mission of Mercy
—
3
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
4
Miracles From Heaven
International
5
The Waymaker
Religion
6
Springfield Rescue Mission

The goal of the springfield rescue mission since 1892 has been to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the hungry, homeless, addicted, and poor by introducing them to christ and helping them apply the word of god to every area of their…

Human Services
7
Life As Mission
Unclassified
8
The Blessing Movement
Human Services
9
The Children's Heart Lane
Arts & Culture
10
Mpowr Missions
Religion
11
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
12
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rescue Mission of Mahoning Valley; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Degree. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 210 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $136,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKTHE SALVATION ARMY: $136,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYAKRON CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $36,000 · OtherRESCUE MISSION: $36,000 · Other+189 more: $674,000 · Other+189 moreNEIGHBORHOOD DEGREE: $150,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHO…RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $100,000 · PhilanthropyBRIGHTSIDE PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $36,000 · ReligionCANFIELD OPERATION BLESSINGS: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,018,000Human Services$150,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Youth Development$100,000Health$100,000Religion$36,000Food & Nutrition$4,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEGREE: $150,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $36,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANFIELD OPERATION BLESSINGS: $4,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEGREE ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTSIDE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AKRON CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity Foundation · Youngstown Fdn General · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dale and Alyce Sheely Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dale and Alyce Sheely Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 210 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dale and Alyce Sheely’s filings →

    More from the funding graph