Skip to content
Daily Service Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Daily Service Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$328k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.3MInternational$749kReligion$208kYouth Development$125kHuman Services$69kPhilanthropy$61kHealth$40kFood & Nutrition$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA$100,000
MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION$75,000
LYONS EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FUND INC$50,000
MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION$40,000
VAPOR SPORTS MINISTRIES$25,000
MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION$12,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA$10,000
MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION$8,000
MISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL$5,000
HANDICAPPED CHILDREN OF AFGHANISTAN$1,000
FAITH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$1,000
OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $180k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $75k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $50k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $50k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $50k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $40k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $25k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $180k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $20k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $150k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $16k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $100k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $15k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $100k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $12k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $75k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $11k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $25k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $10k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $20k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $8k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $10k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $7k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $10k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $7k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $5k → 8%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $10k → 12%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $10k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IN
CT
CA
UT
CO
AZ
AR
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 12 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$1.8M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+74%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +473%
  • VS
    Vapor Sports Ministries
    8× · 2017–2024 · $217k · revenue +177%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA
    2× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROWNSVILLE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • BC
    BRIGHTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +23%
  • KP
    KENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Food Rescue

Food redistribution- rescue food that would otherwise go to waste and distribute it to low-income communities across Boulder.

Food & Nutrition
2
Women's Bean Project

To change women's lives by providing stepping stones to self-sufficiency through social enterprise.

Employment
3
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
4
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
5
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
6
Goodwill of Colorado

Goodwill of colorado accomplishes its life-changing mission through many diverse and innovative employment and life skills programs that foster confidence and opportunity for individuals with economic and development challenges that keep…

Employment
7
Business for Social Responsibility

Bsr is a global nonprofit organization that works with its network of more than 300 member companies to build a just and sustainable world. from its offices in asia, europe, and north america, bsr develops sustainable business strategies…

Education
8
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Fountains of Hope International Inc

Fountains of Hope is committed to serving God by providing safe water and community needs in developing countries and in disaster relief areas worldwide.

International
11
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
12
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mission Enablers International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $1,270,500 · Human ServicesMUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesWORLD VISION INC: $455,807 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCMISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL: $64,000 · InternationalMISSION ENABLERS INTERN…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA: $125,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLU…CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROWNSVILLE: $100,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE O…LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $80,000 · OtherLIFEBRIDGE CHRISTI…Lyons Elevating All Fund: $50,000 · OtherLyons Elevating Al…+18 more: $74,450 · Other+18 moreVapor Sports Ministries: $216,760 · ReligionVapor Spo…THE LONGMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyBRIGHTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · HealthROBERTA'S LEGACY: $10,000 · HealthKENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,270,750International$524,807Other$429,450Religion$216,760Philanthropy$60,500Health$40,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $1,270,500 over 8y, 20% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $455,807 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVapor Sports Ministries: $216,760 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA: $125,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL: $64,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LONGMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLyons Elevating All Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBRIGHTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAFGHANS4TOMORROW INC: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Longmont Communit…The Denver FoundationCommunity Foundation …Anschutz Family Found…The Jorgensen Foundat…Mile High United Way …Rose Community Founda…El Pomar FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Jorgensen Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daily Service Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daily Service Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daily Service’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home