· Private foundation
Daily Service Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA | $100,000 |
| MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION | $75,000 |
| LYONS EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FUND INC | $50,000 |
| MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION | $40,000 |
| VAPOR SPORTS MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION | $12,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA | $10,000 |
| MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION | $8,000 |
| MISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| HANDICAPPED CHILDREN OF AFGHANISTAN | $1,000 |
| FAITH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | $1,000 |
| OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +473%
- VSVapor Sports Ministries8× · 2017–2024 · $217k · revenue +177%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA2× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- CDCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROWNSVILLEone grant, 2018 · $100k
- BCBRIGHTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +23%
- KPKENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food redistribution- rescue food that would otherwise go to waste and distribute it to low-income communities across Boulder.
To change women's lives by providing stepping stones to self-sufficiency through social enterprise.
Provide food for individuals in need
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.
Goodwill of colorado accomplishes its life-changing mission through many diverse and innovative employment and life skills programs that foster confidence and opportunity for individuals with economic and development challenges that keep…
Bsr is a global nonprofit organization that works with its network of more than 300 member companies to build a just and sustainable world. from its offices in asia, europe, and north america, bsr develops sustainable business strategies…
Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
Fountains of Hope is committed to serving God by providing safe water and community needs in developing countries and in disaster relief areas worldwide.
Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.
Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mission Enablers International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Vapor Sports Ministries ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds MISSION ENABLERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE LONGMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lyons Elevating All Fund ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERTA'S LEGACY ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AFGHANS4TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds BEADFORLIFE ↗
- Who funds THE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Jorgensen Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daily Service Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.