How much did DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

shreeinternational

2021

shri navpadnavpad aradhana

2022

—

2023

international

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $250
$10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

Microbiome Research Inc$50,000
Asia Society Texas Center$25,000
The Akshaya Patra Foundation USA$25,000
Texas Advocacy Project$15,000
Gujarati Samaj of Houston Inc$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 8%. 70% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$277k · 14 repeat orgs$346k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$277k

$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%

+22%

Still filing today

57%

21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesReligionInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MR
Microbiome Research Inc
2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +53%
AS
Asia Society Texas Center
2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +104%
TA
Texas Advocacy Project
3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +229%

Funded once

EW
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUPgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +109%
SH
Sam Houston State University
one grant, 2022 · $25k
TI
TEXAS INDIA FORUM
one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Houston Maharashtra Mandal

Providing a platform for the Indian Diaspora from the Maharashtra state of India for social engagement as well as promotion and dissemenation of its language and culture.

Arts & Culture

Indo-American Eye Care Society Inc

To promote (1) free and affordable eye care and (2)training and research in optometry and opthalmology at hyderabad eye institute, hyderabad, india and its affiliates

Health

A W Gayatri Pariwar Houston

Educational and religious activities Advance teaching of Hindu Vedic Scripures

Religion

The Desai Foundation

Education

Asian American Health Coalition of the Greater Houston Area

The organization provides quality health care programs and service to individuals in its community, including primary care and preventative services.

Health

Jaipur Jewels in Texas Foundation

International

Dasra

Dasra, inc. (dasra) is a not-for-profit corporation organized under the lawsof the united states having its registered office at one riverway, suite 1900, houston, tx77056 of the state of texas. dasra's mission is to cultivate strategic…

International

Hindu Temple of San Antonio Foundation

The mission of the organization is to build endowment fund for the exclusive benefit of hindu temple of san antonio a 501c3 church organization

Religion

Ashra Charitable Fund Inc

Conduct activities for the general benefit of persons of indian origin in us & in the world

International

Global Hindu Heritage Foundation

Preserve and protect Hindu Temples and Hindu Heritage

Religion

Houston Durgabari Society

To serve the Hindu community by promoting religious, cultural, educational, social and charitable activities.

Religion

Ansaar-E-Fatemi Dawat Inc

Ansaar-E-Fatemi Dawat Inc ("AEFD") has been formed to carry out, among other things, pious, religious and charitable activities for Dawoodi Bohra Community led by His Holiness Syedna Taher Fakhruddin, and to defend and protect the…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gujarati Samaj of Houston Inc and the most unlike its peers is Faizi Fellowship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/28

the rest of the field

13%

17,176/136,776

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/21

Grantees still filing

14/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$322,682Arts & Culture$96,951Health$81,000Environment$40,001Human Services$33,003Religion$25,001Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX13.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FALLBROOK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~52 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 760610496 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FALLBROOK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 52 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to DAAN Nonprofit Private Foundation?

More from the funding graph