Skip to content

· Private foundation

D&E Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$202k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$3.9MFood & Nutrition$993kHealth$532kEducation$450kHuman Services$70kInternational$60kPhilanthropy$25kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANDREWS UNIVERSITY$100,000
ADVENTIST HEALTH INTERNATIONAL$25,000
KEN & MABEL BRACE FOUNDATION$25,000
YPAO-ORDOT SDA CHURCH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
AMEN$7,000
PORTLAND SDA CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUTPOST CENTERS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
MA
OR
PA
CA
MD
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of D&E Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

D&E Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 25 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$5.9M
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-11%

Still filing today

32%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    Weimar Institute
    3× · 2019–2023 · $255k · revenue +14%
  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $200k · revenue +61%
  • AU
    ANDREWS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $170k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO CENTRAL SDA CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +139%
  • OC
    OUTPOST CENTERS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
2
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
3
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
4
Adventist Today Foundation

Adventist Today is an independent journalist ministry serving the global Adventist community and readers interested in a reliable source of information about the Adventist faith and institutions.

—
5
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
6
Tyndale Theological Seminary Inc Fka Tyndale International Mission

Provide a quality master's level education to approximately 60 degree program students and 20 non-degree students

Education
7
Nations University

Nations University provides religious education, generally free, through a distance learning model (on-line) to approximately 1800 students in 100 nations.

Education
8
Ambassador Baptist College

Degreed courses offered to men and women in training and preparation to enter the ministry of preaching and teaching the Gospel.

Education
9
Remnant University

Providing students with evangelical education in order to bring them up as godly servants and to glorify God

Religion
10
The Master's University and Seminary

The Master's University and Seminary (TMUS) exists to advance the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ through education. This is accomplished through unreserved commitment to worshipping God, authority of Scripture, personal holiness, serving…

Education
11
Universidad Teologica Del Caribe in

UTC is a religious educational non-profit institution who's main mission is to offer Christian education through mayor programs such as associates, bachelor and master degrees in Bible Interpretation, Christian Education, Counseling, Child…

Education
12
Adventist Mountain Missions
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Impact International; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN CONFERENCE OF SDA: $2,218,000 · OtherMICHIGAN CONFERENCE OF SDAPENNSYLVANIA CONFERENCE OF SDA: $1,200,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA CONFERENCE OF SDAPIONEER MEMORIAL CHURCH: $335,000 · OtherPIONEER MEMORIAL CHURCHWeimar Institute: $255,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $218,907 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH: $200,000 · Other+23 more: $789,950 · Other+23 moreIT IS WRITTEN INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyIT IS WRI…ANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $170,000 · EducationMISSION COLLEGE OF EVANGELISM: $45,000 · EducationKEN AND MABEL BRACE FOUNDATION INC: $143,000 · ReligionCHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONAL: $35,180 · InternationalAdventist Health International: $25,000 · International1888 Message Study Committee: $26,100 · Arts & CultureOUTPOST CENTERS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHATTANOOGA SURGICAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Health
Other$5,216,857Philanthropy$500,000Education$215,000Religion$143,000International$60,180Arts & Culture$26,100Human Services$25,000Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIT IS WRITTEN INC: $500,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWeimar Institute: $255,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $170,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEN AND MABEL BRACE FOUNDATION INC: $143,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMISSION COLLEGE OF EVANGELISM: $45,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetCHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONAL: $35,180 over 3y, 0.8% of budget1888 Message Study Committee: $26,100 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetOUTPOST CENTERS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAdventist Health International: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Biblical World: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IT IS WRITTEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Weimar Institute ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KEN AND MABEL BRACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MISSION COLLEGE OF EVANGELISM ↗
  • Who funds CHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds 1888 Message Study Committee ↗
  • Who funds OUTPOST CENTERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Adventist Health International ↗
  • Who funds The Biblical World ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA SURGICAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asi Missions IncMD22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asi Missions Inc · Winifred Stevens Foundation · Sffc Foundation Inc · Versacare Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D&E Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D&E Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D&E’s filings →

    More from the funding graph