Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sffc Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$798k
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$5.8MReligion$326kInternational$57kHuman Services$42kYouth Development$23kFood & Nutrition$18kScience & Tech$10kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $190k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $609k
$10,444
Median grant
21
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGEDALE ACADEMY$49,658
MADISON ACADEMY$35,994
SAN DIEGO ACADEMY$30,163
WALLA WALLA VALLEY ACADEMY$28,560
ANDREWS ACADEMY$27,440
SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY$26,880
PORTLAND ADVENTIST ACADEMY$25,760
LA SIERRA ACADEMY$25,634
LOMA LINDA ACADEMY$25,522
CALDWELL ADVENTIST ELEMENTARY SCHOO$23,275
LEARNING TREE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$21,761
GREENEVILLE ADVENTIST ACADEMY$21,434
ANDREWS UNIVERSITY$21,357
ATLANTA ADVENTIST ACADEMY$20,720
MADISON CAMPUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$20,480
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OLMALAIKA INC: $22k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
IL
MI
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
HI
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 86 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

86 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
27

Total granted

$5.9M
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+163%

Still filing today

5%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOUTHERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M
  • CA
    COLLEGEDALE ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $248k
  • AU
    ANDREWS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $218k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • BE
    BLESSED EDGE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES
    one grant, 2022 · $47k
  • MV
    MEADOW VIEW JUNIOR ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $23k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
2
Adventist Health International

Enable, empower, and strengthen the multi-faceted health ministry and mission of the Seventh-day Adventist Church throughout the world.

International
3
Rooted Ministries

Rooted Ministries endeavors to train, equip, and empower people to a greater, Christ-centered destiny in Gulu, Uganda, and Orange County, California. Rooted Ministries Nursery and Primary School, and Rooted Ministries Secondary Academy…

Religion
4
Gods Daily Word Ministries

Ministry services of the sacerdotal functions required of an ordained minister through the internet and by written publications and through evangelism and education in Kenya, Africa as well as the sport - ultrarunning - community in the…

Religion
5
Christian Mission Aid Inc

The funds are used to assist the vulnerable and under-privileged, providing them with the basic necessities of life, meeting their spiritual, physical and social needs especially addressing child poverty and impact of diseases, disasters…

International
6
India Evangelical Mission

IEMs ministry is devoted to Christian evangelism, the training equipping of Indian nationals and meeting the physical needs of the poor and needy in India. This is accomplished by raising funds in the United States funding an affiliate…

7
Manna Mission Inc

Christian Based Hospital/Church

8
Sonshine Ministries International

We provide homes, a healthy diet, medical treatment, quality education, and counseling for orphaned abused and neglected children in Tanzania, East Africa. Sonshine works directly with Child Welfare Services of Tanzania. CWS provides…

9
Harvest Mission International

Christian missions and ministries oversea countries; in Cambodia and Mali, church planting, evangelism, medical mission, schools (K - 12), helping the poor and the needy, Crusades, mercy missions (distributing rice, medicine, etc),…

Religion
10
Kingdom Investment International Inc

Kingdom Investment works among the poor and oppressed to bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God that results in holistic transformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Religion
11
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
12
Tyndale Theological Seminary Inc Fka Tyndale International Mission

Provide a quality master's level education to approximately 60 degree program students and 20 non-degree students

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Impact International and the most unlike its peers is Andrews University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 79 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%87%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%0%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%97%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/81
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY — $1,996,102 · OtherSOUTHERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITYCOLLEGEDALE ACADEMY — $248,268 · Other+112 more — $3,508,580 · Other+112 moreANDREWS UNIVERSITY — $218,114 · EducationMADISON ACADEMY — $158,383 · EducationIT IS WRITTEN INC — $70,500 · PhilanthropyCHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 · InternationalOLMALAIKA INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL VILLAGE MINISTRIES INC — $7,050 · HealthMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $1,200 · HealthTHE MADISON FARM — $2,000 · Food & NutritionFARM STEW INTERNATIONAL — $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,752,950Education$376,497Philanthropy$70,500International$50,000Human Services$22,000Health$8,250Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY — $218,114 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIT IS WRITTEN INC — $70,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOLMALAIKA INC — $22,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $20,076 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWeimar Institute — $7,105 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL VILLAGE MINISTRIES INC — $7,050 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE MADISON FARM — $2,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetFARM STEW INTERNATIONAL — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDREWS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MADISON ACADEMY
  • Who funds IT IS WRITTEN INC
  • Who funds CHILD IMPACT INTERNATIONAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Versacare IncCA82.4× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Versacare Inc · Winifred Stevens Foundation · Asi Missions Inc · The Sir Philip Sidney Foundation · Rs Foundation · D&E Foundation · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation · Bainum Family Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sffc Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sffc Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sffc Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph