Skip to content
D'Aloia Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

D'Aloia Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$797k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$164k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MEducation$1.1MYouth Development$972kReligion$360kHuman Services$259kArts & Culture$33kFood & Nutrition$22kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $714k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROOVE WITH ME$163,600
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$150,000
OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$125,000
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$125,000
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INC$50,000
DATTOLI CANCER FOUNDATION$35,000
MIRIAMS HEART$28,500
BONNIE BRAE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIRIAMS HEART: $50k → 5%MIRIAMS HEART: $50k → 5%MIRIAMS HEART: $45k → 5%MIRIAMS HEART: $45k → 5%MIRIAMS HEART: $29k → 5%MIRIAMS HEART: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 20 repeat orgs$294k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$4.7M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTGERS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2020 · $405k · revenue +39%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +44%
  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $310k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • PF
    POINT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -14%
  • TB
    THE BROOKE HEALEY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +73%
  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Assumption Family Health Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Understood for All Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
17/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROOVE WITH ME INC: $966,840 · EducationGROOVE WITH ME INCRUTGERS PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $405,000 · EducationRUTGERS PREPARATORY SCHOOLHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $310,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $174,000 · EducationTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDUniversity of Miami: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami+3 more: $35,000 · EducationOCEAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $625,000 · OtherOCEAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $375,000 · OtherHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONUNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INC: $350,000 · OtherUNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INCNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC: $262,750 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES I…DATTOLI CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · OtherDATTOLI CANCER FOUNDATION INC+15 more: $126,000 · Other+15 moreMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $350,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI MED…Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $300,000 · HealthFoundation for …+6 more: $45,500 · Health+6 moreMiriams Heart Inc: $223,500 · Human ServicesBONNIE BRAE: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCITY HARVEST INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISHNJ INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMASBIA: $1,500 · Food & NutritionTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Education$2,040,840Other$1,913,750Health$695,500Human Services$248,500Arts & Culture$30,000Food & Nutrition$21,500Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROOVE WITH ME INC: $966,840 over 8y, 27% of budgetRUTGERS PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $405,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INC: $350,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $310,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $300,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC: $262,750 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMiriams Heart Inc: $223,500 over 6y, 77% of budgetDATTOLI CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 over 7y, 76% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $174,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBONNIE BRAE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WINSTON SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUILD OF OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROOKE HEALEY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGBSCIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF HIH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP NEJEDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHaven Media Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMASBIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDogs Playing for Life Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHappy Hearts Fund Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Hyde and Watson F…Chubb Charitable Foun…American Express Foun…Jewish Communal FundThe Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…Raymond James Charita…
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ17.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · American Express Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D'Aloia Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D'Aloia Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Nourishnj Inc: 27% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Bonnie Brae: 3% of income from government
  • Miriams Heart Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to D'Aloia Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to D'Aloia Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on D'Aloia Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home