Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

D 14 28 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$112kHuman Services$80kHealth$68kReligion$55kPublic Benefit$42kYouth Development$37kHousing & Shelter$33kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$40,000
PARKRIDGE PREGNANCY MEDICAL CLINIC$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC$8,500
BOOM$5,000
ONE VOICE HOME$5,000
MEL BRUECHART MINISTIRES$3,000
STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAKERSFIELD ANGELS: $5k → 18%FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $20k → 13%FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $10k → 13%ONE VOICE HOME: $5k → 17%RECLAIMED 43: $5k → 22%BREEDLOVE FOODS INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
NV
IA
CA
CO
MO
AZ
AR
NC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$412k · 16 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
31

Total granted

$412k
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+13%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +5%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +7%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • MI
    MERCY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • P
    PARKRIDGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
The a Partners Dba the Antioch Partners

To send out followers of jesus to participate in god's mission in the world. we are committed to inviting people to follow jesus, social justice and establishing worshipping communities among unreached and least-reached peoples throughout…

Religion
6
Global Outreach Ministries

Global outreach ministries exists to bring transformation to the nations of latin america by training influential leaders, planting relevant churches, and mobilizing christ-followers to transform their communities.

Religion
7
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
8
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
9
Outreach Foundation of the Presbyterian Church Inc

Fueling the global mission of christ by growing trusted relationships and helping the church live out its missional calling.

10
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
11
Reaching International

Reaching the marketplace with the gospel of the kingdom of god through local/regional gatherings with business leaders, small business alliance groups and multigenerational mentoring programs for businesses.

Religion
12
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Texas South Plains Honor Flight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARKRIDGE PREGNANCY MEDICAL CLINIC — $40,000 · OtherPARKRIDGE PREGNANCY MEDICAL CLINICTEXAS GIRLS BOYS RANCH — $30,000 · OtherTEXAS GIRLS BOYS RANCHIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISSION INDIA — $13,000 · OtherMERCY INC — $10,030 · OtherPARKRIDGE — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherOPERATION HOPE — $10,000 · OtherTODO LOS NATIONALAS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · OtherSTUDENTS INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · Other+20 more — $59,010 · Other+20 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION…PLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC — $11,565 · EducationPLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN A…CAPITOL COMMISSION INC — $40,000 · ReligionCAPITOL COMMIS…FORERUNNERS FOR CHRIST INC — $30,000 · ReligionFORERUNNERS FO…MEL BRUECHERT MINISTRIES — $3,000 · ReligionLAUNCH GLOBAL — $3,000 · Religion+1 more — $500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR — $30,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF…BREEDLOVE FOODS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBREEDLOVE …TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS — $5,000 · Human ServicesTRANSFORMA…ONE VOICE HOME — $5,000 · Human ServicesONE VOICE …Reclaimed 43 — $5,000 · Human ServicesReclaimed …FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC — $33,206 · Housing & ShelterFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAINVIEW PAYDAY — $10,000 · HealthCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Health
Other$272,040Education$111,565Religion$76,500Human Services$55,000Housing & Shelter$33,206Youth Development$25,000Health$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITOL COMMISSION INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC — $33,206 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetFORERUNNERS FOR CHRIST INC — $30,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR — $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC — $11,565 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAINVIEW PAYDAY — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBREEDLOVE FOODS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENTS INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReclaimed 43 — $5,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetMEL BRUECHERT MINISTRIES — $3,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SOUTH PLAINS HONOR FLIGHT — $2,060 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRainbow Room Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAPITOL COMMISSION INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC
  • Who funds FORERUNNERS FOR CHRIST INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds PLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds PLAINVIEW PAYDAY
  • Who funds BREEDLOVE FOODS INC
  • Who funds STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS
  • Who funds ONE VOICE HOME
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds Reclaimed 43
  • Who funds MEL BRUECHERT MINISTRIES
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TEXAS SOUTH PLAINS HONOR FLIGHT
  • Who funds Rainbow Room Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of West TexasTX21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization D 14 28 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to D 14 28 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to D 14 28 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph