Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cynthia B Tomlinson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$256kEducation$128kHealth$124kPhilanthropy$87kRecreation & Sports$81kPublic Benefit$51kScience & Tech$50kFood & Nutrition$36k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $97k
$16,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Saving Grace$16,000
Central Oregon Community College Foundation$16,000
John Austin Cheley Foundation$16,000
Mountain Star Family Relief Nursury$16,000
Los Charros Foundation$13,000
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation$10,000
Benaroya Research Institute at VM$10,000
Gales Creek Camp Foundation$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Saving Grace: $16k → 10%Saving Grace: $16k → 10%Saving Grace: $15k → 10%Saving Grace: $15k → 10%Saving Grace: $15k → 10%Mountain Star Family Relief Nursury: $16k → 10%Mountain Star Family Relief Nursury: $16k → 10%Mountain Star Family Relief Nursury: $15k → 10%MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $15k → 10%Mountain Star Family Relief Nursury: $15k → 10%Mountain Star Family Relief Nursury: $15k → 10%MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $12k → 10%MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $12k → 10%MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $12k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$806k · 13 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$806k
$3k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $128k · revenue +23%
  • MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $128k · revenue +83%
  • SG
    SAVING GRACE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $77k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • DF
    DOUGLAS FOSTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
2
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
3
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
10
Colorado Mountain College Foundation Inc

The colorado mountain college foundation builds sustainable community support for the needs and strategic priorities of colorado mountain college and its students.

—
11
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John Austin Cheley Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Benaroya Research Institute At Virginia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $128,000 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONJOHN AUSTIN CHENEY FOUNDATION: $51,000 · OtherJOHN AUSTIN CHENEY FOUNDATIONSAVING GRACE: $51,000 · OtherSAVING GRACEBenaroya Research Institute at VM: $50,000 · OtherBenaroya Research Institute at VMJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCHARROS DE OREGON USA: $36,000 · OtherCHARROS DE OREGON USADOUG FOSTER FOUNDATION: $22,000 · OtherDOUG FOSTER FOUNDATION+1 more: $3,000 · OtherMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $128,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF N…SAVING GRACE: $77,000 · Human ServicesSAVING GRACEBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $50,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH…BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA: $37,000 · HealthBENAROYA RES…JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $77,000 · Recreation & SportsJOHN AUSTIN…GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsLOS CHARROS FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 · Philanthropy
Other$378,000Human Services$205,000Health$87,000Recreation & Sports$81,000Philanthropy$62,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $128,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $128,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSAVING GRACE: $77,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $77,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetLOS CHARROS FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
  • Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS CHARROS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cynthia B Tomlinson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cynthia B Tomlinson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 61%
  • Saving Grace: 61% of income from government
  • Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cynthia B Tomlinson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cynthia B Tomlinson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cynthia B Tomlinson’s filings →

More from the funding graph