Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ct Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$813kEnvironment$663kAnimals$394kHuman Services$290kEducation$214kHousing & Shelter$210kCivil Rights$149kYouth Development$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $364k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUST THE PILL$125,000
ALI FORNEY CENTER$125,000
SPECIAL NEEDS ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB (SNARR NE)$125,000
LGBT CENTER$100,000
CALLEN-LORDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$100,000
HOPEWELL FUND FBO PROJECT INTERRUPT$100,000
MAYDAY MEDICINES INC$75,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTHCARE EDUCATION FUND$62,500
LOWER EAST SIDE ECOLOGY CENTER$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$50,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY$50,000
PUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT$49,250
FARM SANCTUARY$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFE HORIZON: $25k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Ct Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Ct Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 18 repeat orgs$690k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$2.7M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+891%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $605k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $210k · revenue +49%
  • MM
    MAYDAY MEDICINES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +72%
  • PR
    PUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $149k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • CC
    CT CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • MT
    MINDUP - THE GOLDIE HAWN FOUNADTION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • HO
    HEART OF DINNER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +891% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
3
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
4
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
8
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
9
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
10
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
11
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
12
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersPublic Library SupportDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Animal Rescue and AdoptionUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Lgbtq+ Community CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%14%<5yr14%14%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%17%<5yr14%21%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 17% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,731

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOWER EAST SIDE ECOLOGY CENTER — $198,000 · OtherLOWER EAST SIDE ECOLOGY CENTERLGBT CENTER — $175,000 · OtherLGBT CENTERSPECIAL NEEDS ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB (SNARR NE) — $125,000 · OtherSPECIAL NEEDS ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB (SNARR NE…SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC — $115,000 · OtherSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL …HOPEWELL FUND FBO PROJECT INTERRUPT — $100,000 · OtherHOPEWELL FUND FBO PROJECT INTERRUPTSNARR — $85,000 · OtherSNARRIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $115,000 · OtherTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INCNORTH FUND — $100,000 · OtherNORTH FUND+9 more — $150,280 · Other+9 moreJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION — $375,000 · HealthJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVIC…MAYDAY MEDICINES INC — $150,000 · HealthMAYDAY MEDICINES INCCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE EDUCATION FUND — $112,500 · HealthCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT HE…COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC — $100,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJEC…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $200,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURC…COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentCOUNCIL ON THE …HARLEM GROWN INC — $55,000 · EnvironmentHARLEM GROWN IN…+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $109,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC — $105,000 · AnimalsBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc — $10,000 · AnimalsSARGES ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · AnimalsASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · Animals+1 more — $5,000 · AnimalsTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $138,832 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $50,000 · EducationMOUSE INC — $25,000 · EducationALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $210,000 · Housing & ShelterPUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT — $149,250 · Civil Rights
Other$1,463,280Health$737,500Environment$465,000Animals$249,000Education$213,832Housing & Shelter$210,000Civil Rights$149,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION — $375,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $210,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYDAY MEDICINES INC — $150,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT — $149,250 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $138,832 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $115,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC — $115,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE EDUCATION FUND — $112,500 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $109,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC — $105,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM GROWN INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUSE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF DINNER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetOUTDOOR AFRO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARGES ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Haven of Asheville — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rt Charitable FoundationNJ15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rt Charitable Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Global Impact · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ct Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ct Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ct Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph