Skip to content

· Private foundation

Csi Gives Back Inc

$123k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Education$196kFood & Nutrition$81kHealth$45kArts & Culture$33kYouth Development$14kCommunity Improvement$6kRecreation & Sports$4kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $99k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Charger Academy$32,295
Sadie T Tillis Elementry School$27,321
Duval County Public Schools$17,168
Andrew Jackson High School$12,584
Hunger Fight$10,000
University of Florida$5,000
Dreams Come True Jacksonville$5,000
Best Buy Co Inc$4,084
Tetlak LLC$3,500
CODR Inc$2,700
Individual grant recipient$1,679
Jacksonville University$1,200
Individual grant recipient$660
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Mason's Voice: $600 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
OR
IA
CA
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$288k · 9 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
24

Total granted

$288k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HUNGER FIGHT INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $28k · revenue +58%
  • JU
    Jacksonville University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +27%
  • JH
    JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • ST
    Sadie T Tillis Elementary School
    one grant, 2021 · $37k
  • B
    Biscottis
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
2
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
5
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
6
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
7
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
10
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
11
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
12
Herpes Cure Advocacy

Informed advocacy relating to the cure, treatment and prevention for herpes simplex virus types 1 + 2 infections.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central & Northern Florida; the most unlike its peers is Masons Voice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Charger Academy: $71,549 · OtherCharger AcademyIndividual grant recipient: $61,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSadie T Tillis Elementry School: $43,203 · OtherSadie T Tillis Elementry SchoolSadie T Tillis Elementary School: $37,382 · OtherSadie T Tillis Elementary SchoolDUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $35,296 · OtherDUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $24,092 · OtherDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INCBiscottis: $20,869 · OtherBiscottisAndrew Jackson High School: $20,465 · OtherAndrew Jackson High School+21 more: $49,521 · Other+21 moreHUNGER FIGHT INC: $28,000 · Food & NutritionAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,144 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,075 · HealthSt Charles Health System Inc: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $750 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA: $500 · HealthCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentJacksonville University: $2,400 · EducationJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,842 · AnimalsMASONS VOICE INC: $600 · Human Services
Other$363,977Food & Nutrition$28,000Health$14,969Youth Development$5,000Education$2,400Animals$1,842Human Services$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNGER FIGHT INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $24,092 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,144 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSt Charles Health System Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,842 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON NASHVILLE INC: $1,016 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASONS VOICE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUNGER FIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Charles Health System Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MASONS VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pga Tour IncFL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pga Tour Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Csi Gives Back Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Csi Gives Back Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Jacksonville University: 3% of income from government
  • St Charles Health System Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Csi Gives Back Inc?

Find your warmest path to Csi Gives Back Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Csi Gives Back’s filings →

More from the funding graph