Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cron Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$88kEducation$70kInternational$51kEnvironment$32kReligion$13kPhilanthropy$9kCommunity Improvement$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$376k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CU FOUNDATION$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$5,000
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$2,500
LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE$2,500
ONEHOPE$2,000
MATINECOCK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION$200
NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE$100
EAST HAMPTON MEALS ON WHEELS$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $1k → 10%SERVE HAITI INC: $200 → 13%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $1k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
SD
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MD
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$187k · 17 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
24

Total granted

$187k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-2%

Still filing today

82%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +79%
  • TN
    THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +8%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • OH
    ONE HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -2%
  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
11
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Hope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Child and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%21%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%31%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,728

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
13/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ONE HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherONE HOPE FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $13,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN — $12,500 · OtherNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN+20 more — $12,675 · Other+20 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $31,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATI…COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATIO…LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC — $7,500 · EducationLEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INCNew York University — $7,000 · EducationNew York UniversityST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE+1 more — $2,000 · EducationTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC — $30,850 · EnvironmentTHE NORTH SHO…+1 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $1,500 · Health+2 more — $350 · HealthTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $8,000 · PhilanthropyDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE — $7,000 · PhilanthropyALEXANDER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT HOUSE — $2,500 · Human ServicesALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK — $2,000 · Human ServicesSERVEHAITI INC — $200 · Human ServicesEPIC PLAYERS INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$123,675Education$77,500Environment$31,850Health$21,850Philanthropy$16,000Human Services$4,700Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC — $30,850 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE HORSE HOLLOW SCHOLARSHIP AND RELIEF FUND INC — $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEPIC PLAYERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE TO WORLD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALEXANDER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTILL I RUN — $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATINECOCK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION — $300 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBEAVER DAM WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS RHODE ISLAND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVEHAITI INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HAMPTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANDAS NETWORKORG — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Communal FundRenaissance Charitabl…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cron Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines