Skip to content
Crockett Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Crockett Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Human Services$85kHousing & Shelter$18kReligion$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kArts & Culture$10kEducation$10kHealth$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATLE$30,000
SHIRTS ACROSS AMERICA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER$8,000
SHARING ALONGSIDE$8,000
SOULUMINATION$5,000
THE DANNA K JOHNSTON FOUNDATION$5,000
BABY 2 BABY$5,000
FULCRUM FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%WESTSIDE BABY: $7k → 9%SOULUMINATION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 6 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$136k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+22%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +88%
  • JW
    JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +89%
  • SA
    Shirts Across America
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • MP
    Maris Placegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +80%
  • SC
    SAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +57%
  • WESTSIDE BABY
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Haiti Babi

Haiti Babi is a not for profit social enterprise that employs mothers in Haiti to knit and crochet high quality artisanal baby products. One in ten children in Haiti lives in an orphanage and 80% of those children have living parents who…

—
2
Loved Twice

The mission of Loved Twice is to clothe newborns in need with quality reused baby clothing for the first year of life. For us, even one baby going without proper clothing is one too many. We believe the community starts with serving our…

Human Services
3
Women Giving Back Inc

Women Giving Back (WGB) supports vulnerable families in the Greater Washington DC area by providing quality clothing and other essentials at no cost assisted by a caring and committed community.

Employment
4
Baby's Bounty

To provide essential clothing and supplies to babies born into disadvantaged families.

Human Services
5
Babies of Homelessness

Babies of Homelessness provides diapers, wipes, and formula to local families in need by leveraging the power and generosity of the community, quickly and without red tape.

Housing & Shelter
6
Southwest Youth and Family Services

SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.

Human Services
7
Water By Women

Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.

Human Services
8
Second Stork

Second stork provides families in need with essential newborn care items to give their baby a safe and healthy start.

Human Services
9
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
10
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
11
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
12
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is BABY2BABY; the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $60,000 · PhilanthropyASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLEWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · PhilanthropyWATER FIRST INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANNA K JOHNSTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherDANNA K JOHNSTON FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFULCRUM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherFULCRUM FOUNDATIONFRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5,000 · OtherFRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENT…MARAVILLA HEALTH: $5,000 · OtherMARAVILLA HEALTHBABY2BABY: $5,000 · OtherBABY2BABYJUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER: $18,000 · Housing & ShelterJUBILEE WOMEN'S C…Shirts Across America: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterShirts Across Ame…SAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesSAFE CROSSI…WESTSIDE BABY: $7,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE BA…SOULUMINATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesSOULUMINATI…SHARING ALONGSIDE: $16,000 · ReligionMaris Place: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $5,000 · Health
Philanthropy$65,000Other$58,000Housing & Shelter$32,000Human Services$20,000Religion$16,000Youth Development$10,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $60,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetJUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER: $18,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSHARING ALONGSIDE: $16,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetSAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWESTSIDE BABY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBABY2BABY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe Foundat…Seattle FoundationWilkins Charitable Fo…Kawabe Memorial FundMoccasin Lake Foundat…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…
The Norcliffe FoundationWA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crockett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crockett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crockett Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home