· Private foundation
Crockett Family Foundation
Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k6 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATLE | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SHIRTS ACROSS AMERICA | $10,000 |
| JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER | $8,000 |
| SHARING ALONGSIDE | $8,000 |
| FULCRUM FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BABY 2 BABY | $5,000 |
| SOULUMINATION | $5,000 |
| THE DANNA K JOHNSTON FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +88%
- JWJUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +89%
- SAShirts Across America2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- MPMaris Placegraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +80%
- SCSAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +57%
WESTSIDE BABYone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Haiti Babi is a not for profit social enterprise that employs mothers in Haiti to knit and crochet high quality artisanal baby products. One in ten children in Haiti lives in an orphanage and 80% of those children have living parents who…
The mission of Loved Twice is to clothe newborns in need with quality reused baby clothing for the first year of life. For us, even one baby going without proper clothing is one too many. We believe the community starts with serving our…
Women Giving Back (WGB) supports vulnerable families in the Greater Washington DC area by providing quality clothing and other essentials at no cost assisted by a caring and committed community.
To provide essential clothing and supplies to babies born into disadvantaged families.
Babies of Homelessness provides diapers, wipes, and formula to local families in need by leveraging the power and generosity of the community, quickly and without red tape.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.
Second stork provides families in need with essential newborn care items to give their baby a safe and healthy start.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…
West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.
Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is BABY2BABY and the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHARING ALONGSIDE ↗
- Who funds Shirts Across America ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds SAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE BABY ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
- Who funds WATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SOULUMINATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crockett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.