Skip to content

· Public charity

Crf Affordable Housing Inc

To promote the welfare of low and moderate income persons, older adults and other special needs populations with housing facilities and services designed to meet their needs.

$6.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$13MReligion$431kHousing & Shelter$160kEducation$84kHuman Services$41kYouth Development$10kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $6,231,185, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,431,540 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $200,355 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.0M
$36,015
Median grant
2
States reached
$108M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE STONE TABLE INC$6,015,170
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FOUNDATION INC$120,000
CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$36,015
BLACKBIRD MISSION$30,000
LIFE 4 REFUGEES$20,000
YOUNG LIFE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE DREAM CENTER: $25k → 14%RISE FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 9 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$13M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+63%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STONE TABLE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13M · revenue +320% · 88% of their budget
  • COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $53k · revenue +38%
  • AL
    Apartment Life Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • DC
    DREAM CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +63%
  • CT
    CALVARY TEMPLE ASSEMBLY OF GOD
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MR
    MERCY ROAD CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
5
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
9
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
10
Community Reinvestment Foundation Xvi Inc

To provide affordable housing for low income elderly persons.

Housing & Shelter
11
Community Reinvestment Foundation Xv Inc

To provide affordable housing for low income elderly persons.

—
12
Christian Housing-Cottonwood Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Apartment Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE STONE TABLE: $12,818,715 · ReligionTHE STONE TABLE+1 more: $40,396 · ReligionCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $177,120 · OtherBLACKBIRD MISSION CHURCH INC: $142,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FOUNDATION II INC: $120,000 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $72,377 · OtherCROSSROADS CHURCH: $43,748 · OtherONEHOPE INC: $30,000 · Other+5 more: $55,000 · OtherCOVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $52,668 · EducationNorth Central University: $31,000 · EducationDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesRISE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 · Youth Development
Religion$12,859,111Other$640,745Education$83,668Human Services$31,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE STONE TABLE: $12,818,715 over 6y, 88% of budgetCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FOUNDATION II INC: $120,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCOVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $52,668 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetApartment Life Inc: $40,396 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Central University: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLakeview Temple Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRISE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE STONE TABLE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FOUNDATION II INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Apartment Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds North Central University ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Lakeview Temple Inc ↗
  • Who funds RISE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Stone TableIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Stone Table · Lilly Endowment Inc · Indianapolis Center for Congregations Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crf Affordable Housing Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crf Affordable Housing Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crf Affordable Housing Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Crf Affordable Housing Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crf Affordable Housing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph