· Public charity
The Stone Table
To assist community, humanitarian and religious organizations in the united states and throughout the global community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $4,494,305 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,592,564 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $98,259 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $174k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
- $250k+1 grant · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORNERSTONE CHURCH | $4,154,022 |
| AG SPRINGFIELD | $53,875 |
| DREAM CENTER | $53,500 |
| SINAPIS GROUP INC | $50,000 |
| OASIS REST INTERNATIONAL | $35,300 |
| RIVER VALLEY CHURCH | $35,000 |
| AGWM | $30,000 |
| FRONT YARD MISSION | $22,500 |
| HENDRICKS LIVE | $15,000 |
| BLACKBIRD MISSION | $15,000 |
| CHARITY CHURCH | $11,500 |
| CENTRO CRISTIANO DE GUAYAQUIL | $10,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $8,608 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP6× · 2020–2025 · $14M
- SGSINAPIS GROUP INC5× · 2021–2025 · $165k · revenue -15%
- TGTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD3× · 2022–2025 · $130k
Funded once
- SFSTABILITY FIRST INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INCone grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +17%- EPEDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GODone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Our vision is for churches and Christian organizations to be filled with leaders who place spiritual formation, discernment, and renewal above all other leadership priorities. Our mission is to cultivate vibrant spirituality and attentive…
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…
Indianapolis theological seminary exists to see a fully accredited theologically reformed mdiv program in central indiana that integrates leadership training in local churches with robust academic instruction for the sake of developing the…
Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…
Christian leadership alliance exists to equip and unite leaders called to transform the world for christ.
To develop christ-centered servant leaders through a challenging academic environment in order to impact the world for the kingdom of god.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covenant Christian Schools of Indianapolis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stability First Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SINAPIS GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTER OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds STABILITY FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds TRUTH AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds HENDRICKS LIVE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds Lakeview Temple Inc ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds North Central University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Crf Affordable Housing Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stone Table funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stone Table?
Find your warmest path to The Stone Table through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.