Skip to content
Crewe Endowment Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Crewe Endowment Foundation

Operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and/or carry out the purposes of crewe foundation, a utah nonprofit organization, which is exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$16M
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$7.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$19MHuman Services$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.0MEducation$468kInternational$460kYouth Development$142kFood & Nutrition$133kRecreation & Sports$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $429k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $14M
$20,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF$6,961,681
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV - BYU ATHL$4,600,000
FOR OTHERS$1,900,000
CREWE FOUNDATION$759,300
WASATCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION$150,000
MENTORS INTERNATIONAL$100,000
RISE AND REBUILD FOUNDATION$100,000
ESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC$100,000
AYUDA EN MEXICO INC$100,000
FRIENDS OF CASA DE HOGAR$100,000
THE COACHES TEAM FOUNDATION$100,000
OTHER SIDE VILLAGE$90,000
NPH USA$82,000
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERISTY FOUN$60,000
PACHAMAMA ALLIANCE$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AUTISM LEARNING FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%ELEVATE CHARITIES: $100k → 10%FOR OTHERS: $1.9M → 4%FOR OTHERS: $380k → 4%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 9%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 9%OGDEN RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 9%RISE AND REBUILD FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $21k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
OR
NV
PA
CA
UT
VA
AZ
TN
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 10 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$23M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-45%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +33%
  • CF
    CREWE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $999k · revenue +633% · 84% of their budget
  • MI
    Mentors International
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • EC
    ELEVATE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
2
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
3
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
4
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
5
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
6
University of Western States

The mission of the University of Western States is to advance the science and art of integrated health care through excellence in education and patient care.

Health
7
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
8
Saltexchange Inc

SaltExchange is a national community of philanthropists united by a shared mission to work collectively to address some of the world's most urgent and complex challenges. We equip donors with the data, tools, and strategic partnerships…

Philanthropy
9
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
10
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
11
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
12
Clean Slate Utah

To help people clear their criminal records and access opportunities. we will do this by: 1) spreading the word about utah's clean slate law to individuals with records, so they are aware of the law and its positive impact on their lives;…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Orphans D/B/a Nph-Usa; the most unlike its peers is Spinehope Fka Spinal Deformity Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
17/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $18,637,341 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS+22 more: $566,500 · OtherFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC: $2,280,000 · Human ServicesFOR OTHERS C…Rise and Rebuild Foundation: $100,000 · Human ServicesELEVATE CHARITIES: $100,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $100,000 · Human Services+6 more: $163,500 · Human Services+6 moreCREWE FOUNDATION: $999,194 · Philanthropy+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyWASATCH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUN: $300,000 · EducationTHE COACHES TEAM FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $50,000 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $30,000 · Education+3 more: $32,500 · EducationMentors International: $200,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $187,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentROAM HUMANITARIAN: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentSan Francisco City Impact: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Other Side Academy: $110,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$19,203,841Human Services$2,743,500Philanthropy$1,019,194Education$512,500International$397,000Youth Development$122,500Crime & Legal$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC: $2,280,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCREWE FOUNDATION: $999,194 over 3y, 84% of budgetWASATCH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUN: $300,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMentors International: $200,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $187,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $110,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE COACHES TEAM FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetRise and Rebuild Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetELEVATE CHARITIES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $55,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAutism Learning Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $33,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $31,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCELESTIAL ZOO PET RESCUE: $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetUTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $20,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSPINEHOPE FKA SPINAL DEFORMITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWILL HARDY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROAM HUMANITARIAN: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEQUALITY UTAH FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco City Impact: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Sorenson Legacy Found…Larry H Miller and Ga…University ImpactDominion Energy Chari…Gs Donor Advised Phil…James Lee Sorenson Fa…Willard L Eccles Char…Cross Charitable Foun…American Endowment Fo…George S and Dolores …doTERRA Healing Hands…
The Community Foundation of UtahUT23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · University Impact · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · James Lee Sorenson Family Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · American Endowment Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crewe Endowment Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crewe Endowment Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Crewe Endowment Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Crewe Endowment Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crewe Endowment’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home