· Private foundation
Crescent Cities Charities Inc
To provide educational assistance to promising students with financial need and to provide grants and programs to worthy charities and community organizations in prince george's county and surrounding region.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k1 grant · $218k
- $250k+1 grant · $668k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $667,787 |
| Individual grant recipient | $218,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 11% of Crescent Cities Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 62% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $886k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YFYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $81k · revenue +44%
- TJTHE JP HOME INC4× · 2020–2023 · $64k · revenue +42% · 26% of their budget
- BGBELLE GROVE INC4× · 2020–2023 · $51k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- HOHOUSE OF RUTHgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +42%
- MRMICHAEL R WALKER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -54%
- DCDORCHESTER CHAMBER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Washington Commanders Foundation is committed to building a more vibrant and enriched DMV community by investing in education, honoring public service, and broadening access to youth football programs. By harnessing the transformative…
The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…
The mission of the george washington foundation is to enhance the public understanding of the lives, values, and legacies of george washington, fielding and betty washington lewis and their family members, particularly in the broader…
To provide extensive comprehensive services to eradicate homelessness among the military veteran community. MCVET participants work through recovery, work toward maintaining livable wages, and permanent housing solutions. The organization…
Veterans Healing Farm enhances the mental, emotional, and physical well-being of our nations Veterans and their families.
To support hospice of the chesapeake, inc., hospice of charles county, calvert hospice in their mission to improve the quality of life for those in our communities experiencing advanced illness or bereavement through hospice, palliative…
Support organization
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
Families of the wounded fund, inc (fotwf) provides financial assistance to families of service members or us agents who were wounded in combat or injured in support of combat operations while the wounded receive treatment at various…
To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…
Assisted Living and Nursing Care
Promote and present the history of Georgetown - Washington, DC. Including working with the National Park Service to improve historical areas, create information centers, and to restore the C&O Canal and Barge in Georgetown.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fight for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anacostia Watershed Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE JP HOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INC ↗
- Who funds BELLE GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds Mountain View Christian Academy ↗
- Who funds SPROUT THERAPEUTIC RIDING & EDUCATION CE ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS IN APRIL - PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Shenandoah Valley Music Festival ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
- Who funds YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LINCOLN THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE 4 MELANIE INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH AND FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE STAR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds C&O CANAL TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Serve Our Willing Warriors ↗
- Who funds Passion and Compassion Inc ↗
- Who funds Maryland Crime Victims' Resource Center ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL R WALKER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BOARD OF THE ROCKS INC ↗
- Who funds ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Chesapeake Bay Trust · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · National Park Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crescent Cities Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Arts Focus — 100% of income from government
- Defensores De La Cuenca — 100% of income from government
- Maryland Crime Victims' Resource Center — 53% of income from government
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Accokeek Foundation Inc — 44% of income from government
- Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc — 34% of income from government
- Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc — 17% of income from government
- Anacostia Watershed Society Inc — 15% of income from government
- Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Crescent Cities Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Crescent Cities Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.