Skip to content
Cresap Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Cresap Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
85
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.8MFood & Nutrition$1.6MHealth$1.4MYouth Development$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MAnimals$862kPhilanthropy$566kHousing & Shelter$545kOther$0
02FY2025 · 85 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k57 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $445k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$14,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$250,000
HOMELESS ALLIANCE$194,800
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$100,000
OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC$50,000
WINGS A SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY$50,000
NATIONAL COWBOY & WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM$50,000
VINITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$44,364
JAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$38,756
OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME$31,900
VINITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$30,000
TEEN CHALLENGE OF OKLAHOMA$30,000
PIVOT INC$30,000
PEACEFUL ANIMAL ADOPTION SHELTER INC$30,000
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC$30,000
WELCH PUBLIC SCHOOLS$27,328
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $15k → 16%DELAWARE COUNTY CHILDRENS SPECIAL ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $20k → 18%DAILY LIVING CENTERS: $25k → 16%HOME OF HOPE INC: $38k → 21%HOME OF HOPE INC: $33k → 21%HOME OF HOPE INC: $30k → 21%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $72k → 16%HOME OF HOPE INC: $30k → 21%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $25k → 16%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $15k → 16%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $15k → 16%CRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $20k → 21%CRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $15k → 21%CRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $15k → 21%CRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $15k → 21%SISU YOUTH INC: $25k → 16%COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $15k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%PIVOT: $65k → 16%PIVOT INC: $30k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $25k → 16%PIVOT INC (FORMERLY YOUTH SERVICES FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC): $30k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $30k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $25k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $30k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $25k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $30k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC -: $25k → 16%PIVOT: $30k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC -: $25k → 16%PIVOT: $30k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC -: $25k → 16%PIVOT: $15k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $25k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $20k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $25k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $20k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INCORPORATED: $25k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $20k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $22k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OH
CO
VA
DE
KS
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 128 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

128 repeat relationships: 64 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

128
71

Total granted

$12M
$813k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+23%

Still filing today

71%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $412k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +47%
  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2018–2023 · $603k · revenue +430%
  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF VINITA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $52k
  • DK
    DALE K GRAHAM VETRANS FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
3
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
4
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
5
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
6
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Oklahoma Alternative Resources

Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
8
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
9
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
10
Oklahoma Community Service Commission Inc

The mission of the oklahoma community service commission is to engage oklahomans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service which supports americorps programs in oklahoma communities. services may include assisting with…

Human Services
11
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
12
Oklahoma Afterschool Network Inc

Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Guardian Ad Litem Institute; the most unlike its peers is Nowata Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

149 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 149 of the 223 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
141/149
Grantees still filing
99/149
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $325,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $258,641 · OtherUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $450,000 · OtherUnited Way of Central Oklahoma IncTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $322,300 · Other+124 more: $4,981,208 · Other+124 moreNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD SERV…SPECIAL CARE INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL CARE INCPIVOT INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCHOME OF HOPE INC: $137,500 · Human ServicesHOME OF HOPE INCSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $132,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SE…DOCSERVIES INC: $124,000 · Human ServicesDOCSERVIES INCCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesCRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $92,023 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing Foundation: $85,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Human Services+20 more: $507,013 · Human Services+20 moreREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,550,350 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD…+1 more: $20,000 · Food & NutritionPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $305,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE: $275,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $202,202 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OTTAWA COUNTY: $50,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $67,100 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $602,500 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $150,000 · AnimalsNEXUS EQUINE INC: $68,750 · Animals+7 more: $90,000 · AnimalsPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $385,000 · EducationThe University of Tulsa: $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $61,000 · Education+6 more: $63,700 · EducationOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $225,289 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $95,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $92,500 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $60,000 · Arts & CultureOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureDEADCENTER FILM FESTIVAL INC: $35,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $65,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,337,149Human Services$2,097,536Food & Nutrition$1,570,350Youth Development$969,302Animals$911,250Education$759,700Arts & Culture$713,289

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,550,350 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $602,500 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $450,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $385,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $325,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $322,300 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $305,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE: $275,000 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $225,289 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $202,202 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetPIVOT INC: $200,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $160,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $150,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INC: $137,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $132,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDOCSERVIES INC: $124,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetREMERGE INC: $120,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC: $116,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $105,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC: $105,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK: $105,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetTHE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $104,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $95,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $92,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $92,023 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $85,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOther Options Inc: $76,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $70,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetNEXUS EQUINE INC: $68,750 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetVINITA DAY CENTER INC: $66,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $61,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $56,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $54,348 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $53,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $52,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DOCSERVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAIG COUNTY NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK ↗
  • Who funds THE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord…American Fidelity Fou…Inasmuch FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Oklahoma City Communi…Sarkeys FoundationHarris Foundation IncThe Anne and Henry Za…The Merrick FoundationArvest FoundationKirkpatrick Foundatio…Wegener Foundation Inc
El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK116.4× affinity56 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cresap Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cresap Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 560%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • George Miksch Sutton Avian Research Center Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Mayes County Hope Coalition: 45% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Canterbury Voices Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Community Crisis Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
56get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cresap Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cresap Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 223 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cresap Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home