Skip to content
Create Healthy Management at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Create Healthy Management

Create Healthy is on a mission for health and wellness in our community; Investing in wellness, empowering communities .

$5.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$3.8MRecreation & Sports$1.8MHealth$916kEducation$597kFood & Nutrition$445kYouth Development$211kHousing & Shelter$35kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $406k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.2M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$176M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bethany Lutheran Church Preschool$1,600,000
Little Hearts Child Development Center$771,786
Fredericksburg Community Health Ctr$545,000
Fredericksburg Independent School District$294,000
Hill Country Community MHMR Center$195,269
Texas Wine Auction Foundation$175,000
Mason United Methodist Church$129,324
Fredericksburg Academic Boosters Inc$126,700
The Grace Center of Fredericksburg$122,500
Blanco Independent School District$102,000
Comfort Independent School District$95,000
Caritas Family Assistance Network Inc$84,000
Boys & Girls Club Of The Highland Lake$80,000
Llano Independent School District$80,000
St Mary's Catholic School$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Undue Medical Debt: $6k → 13%Comfort Golden Age Center Foundation: $20k → 7%Little Hearts Child Development Center: $772k → 10%LITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500k → 10%The Grace Center of Fredericksburg: $123k → 10%Caritas Family Assistance Network Inc: $84k → 10%Gillespie County Committee On Aging: $50k → 10%GRACE CENTER OF FREDERICKSBURG: $35k → 10%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER OF TEXAS: $25k → 10%GOLDEN HUB COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 9 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$5.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-12%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Fredericksburg Community Health Center
    5× · 2018–2024 · $692k · revenue +229% · 26% of their budget
  • TW
    TEXAS WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +119% · 49% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $131k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FF
    FBG FRIENDS OF THE FIELDS
    one grant, 2023 · $900k
  • TT
    THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -29737%
  • GC
    GILLESPIE COUNTY FAIR & FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Food & Fuel Association Scholarship Foundation

The texas food & fuel association scholarship foundation awards scholarships to outstanding students in the state of texas.

Education
2
Farmersville Education Foundation Inc
—
3
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
4
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
5
High Cotton Relief Fund

The mission of high cotton relief fund is to benefit and support farmers and farming communities in and around west texas who are going through tough financial difficulties.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Pantry of Jeff Davis County Inc

None

Food & Nutrition
7
Frisco Education Foundation

To provide scholarships to graduating high school students in the Frisco Independent School District. The Foundation also supports educational programs and educators in the District through Grants for Great Ideas.

Philanthropy
8
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
9
Local North Texas Community Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
11
Frisco Chamber Foundation

The frisco chamber foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that complements the work of the frisco chamber of commerce by building community strength through partnerships, programs, and education.

Philanthropy
12
Texas Higher Education Foundation

The mission of the texas higher education foundation is to increase participation and success in higher education for all texans. the foundation is a support organization for the texas higher education coordinating board. it exists to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gillespie County Committee On Aging iNC. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
12/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2,100,000 · OtherBETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCHFREDERICKSBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $309,000 · OtherFREDERICKSBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER: $195,269 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTERMASON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $129,324 · Other+19 more: $893,570 · Other+19 moreLITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1,271,786 · Human ServicesLITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEV…THE GRACE CENTER: $157,500 · Human ServicesTHE GRACE CENTERCARITAS FAMILY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $84,000 · Human Services+5 more: $126,200 · Human Services+5 moreFBG FRIENDS OF THE FIELDS: $900,000 · Recreation & SportsFBG FRIENDS O…GILLESPIE COUNTY FAIR & FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsFredericksburg Community Health Center: $692,350 · HealthFredericks…+1 more: $11,801 · HealthFREDERICKSBURG ACADEMIC BOOSTERS INC: $126,700 · EducationFREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $76,616 · EducationTHE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationBlanco Education Foundation: $34,200 · EducationHARPER ISD PARENT TEACHER ORG INC: $25,400 · EducationJOHNSON CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $23,800 · EducationMASON ISD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $22,900 · EducationTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL: $22,000 · EducationAMBLESIDE SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL: $17,000 · EducationFREDERICKSBURG BILLIE BOOSTERS INC: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTEXAS WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $25,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $25,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY: $131,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE HIGHLAND LAKES INC: $80,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,627,163Human Services$1,639,486Recreation & Sports$950,000Health$704,151Education$448,616Food & Nutrition$300,000Youth Development$211,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFredericksburg Community Health Center: $692,350 over 5y, 26% of budgetTEXAS WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetTHE GRACE CENTER: $157,500 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY: $131,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCARITAS FAMILY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $84,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE HIGHLAND LAKES INC: $80,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $78,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $76,616 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING iNC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY FAIR & FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARPER ISD PARENT TEACHER ORG INC: $25,400 over 1y, 60% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERS OF TEXAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOLDEN HUB SENIOR CENTER FOUNDATION OF FREDERICKSBURG: $25,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNSON CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $23,800 over 1y, 40% of budgetMASON ISD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $22,900 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL: $22,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetComfort Golden Age Center Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetAMBLESIDE SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL: $17,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG BILLIE BOOSTERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CASA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNAMI Texas Inc: $11,801 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WRITTEN WORD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLights Spectacular Hill Country Style Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Dian Graves Owen Foun…Hal & Charlie Peterso…Adam R Scripps Founda…San Antonio Area Foun…Fredericksburg Social…The Robert P and Mari…Miramar Charitable Fo…Perry & Ruby Stevens …Methodist Healthcare …Bethany Lutheran Foun…Kathryn Nell Harrison…
The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country IncTX38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · Adam R Scripps Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Fredericksburg Social Turn Verein · The Robert P and Mariana R Scripps Family Foundation Inc · Miramar Charitable Foundation · Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Bethany Lutheran Foundation of Fredericksburg Texas Inc · Kathryn Nell Harrison Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Create Healthy Management funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Create Healthy Management. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Create Healthy Management’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home