Skip to content

· Public charity

Crc Cares Foundation

The CRC CARES FOUNDATION empowers individuals to make a difference through a comprehensive approach to giving by uniting individuals together to build a stronger society, raising awareness as an inspiration for action, fostering a culture of accountability, empowering others to improve the world around them and committing resources to…

$285k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$329kHuman Services$305kEducation$288kRecreation & Sports$184kYouth Development$151kHousing & Shelter$130kEmployment$115kPhilanthropy$81kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $221,686, the rows itemized in this filing. The $285,436 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $63,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWEDISH FOUNDATION$78,336
SHELTER TO SOLDIER$20,000
SADDLES IN SERVICE$20,000
BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION$20,000
FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL$12,000
MISSION HIRING HALL$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$10,000
SOLUTIONS EXPLORING SUCCESS POST-HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
RENAISSANCE ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER$10,000
ACE MENTOR SAN DIEGO$10,000
SAN DIEGO ARMED SERVICES YMCA$8,000
YOUNG COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS$7,500
FUTURE CONSTRUCTION LEADERS FOUNDATION$5,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $20k → 11%EMPOWERHER: $10k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS: $20k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%TABLE MINISTRIES: $8k → 13%HOMESTRETCH INC: $10k → 4%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%CRISIS HOUSE: $20k → 11%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO: $20k → 11%BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 19 repeat orgs$793k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
43

Total granted

$1.0M
$706k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+20%

Still filing today

84%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $141k · revenue +111%
  • SB
    Seatac BMX
    2× · 2022–2023 · $124k · revenue +51% · 25% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
    2× · 2018–2019 · $118k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +93%
  • RC
    REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -96%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FIRE FIGHTERS LOCAL 798 SURVIVING FAMILIES FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Zero8Hundred Inc

Zero8hundred's mission is to offer compassionate, evidence-based support to service members and their families, helping them navigate the unique challenges of transitioning from active duty to civilian life through a peer-based social work…

Human Services
4
Sv Home

Driving the creation of affordable housing for a more vibrant and equitable silicon valley.

Housing & Shelter
5
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
6
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
7
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
8
Destination Home Sv co Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Destination: home's mission is to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in santa clara county.

Housing & Shelter
9
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
10
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
11
San Diego Housing Federation

The Federation brings together representatives of affordable housing community development corporations with others interested in the development and management of housing for low and moderate income persons in San Diego County to mutually…

Education
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Southern California Inc; the most unlike its peers is Solutions Exploring Success Post Hs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/59
Grantees still filing
36/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHELSEA'S LIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherCHELSEA'S LIGHT FOUNDATION INCLAS PATRONAS: $51,000 · OtherLAS PATRONASARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USA: $36,500 · OtherARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USATHIRD BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherSOLUTIONS EXPLORING SUCCESS POST HS: $40,000 · OtherSOLUTIONS EXPLORING SUCCESS POST HSTeam River Runner Incorporated: $40,000 · OtherTeam River Runner Incorporated+26 more: $404,250 · Other+26 moreACE MENTOR SAN DIEGO INC: $70,000 · EducationACE MENTOR SAN DIE…FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $54,000 · EducationFRANCIS PARKER SCH…THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUND…OAKLAND SCHOOL INC: $36,400 · EducationOAKLAND SCHOOL INCTALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $30,000 · EducationTALLER SAN JOSE HO…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUND…KIDS CHANCE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $25,000 · EducationKIDS CHANCE OF CAL…+1 more: $7,500 · EducationSeatac BMX: $124,124 · Youth DevelopmentSeatac BMXBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $117,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…Future Construction Leaders Foundation: $18,450 · Youth DevelopmentFuture Construct…+1 more: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $140,771 · HealthSWEDISH MEDICAL…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $30,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIP…SADDLES IN SERVICE: $20,000 · HealthSADDLES IN SERV…Cancer Angels of San Diego: $20,000 · HealthCancer Angels o…Team Parker For Life: $20,000 · HealthTeam Parker For…San Francisco Fire Fighters Cancer Prevention Foundation: $14,000 · HealthSan Francisco F…+1 more: $7,500 · HealthCRISIS HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS HO…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCANINE CO…DONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesDONNIE ED…MIRACLE LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO: $20,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE L…AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $20,000 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S…GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BER…Homestretch Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesHomestret…ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 · Human ServicesELDERHELP…EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER G…TABLE MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $40,000 · PhilanthropyREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropySAN FRANCISCO FIRE FIGHTERS LOCAL 798 SURVIVING FAMILIES FUND: $25,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $10,000 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterVALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$656,750Education$287,900Youth Development$267,574Health$252,271Human Services$147,500Philanthropy$105,000Housing & Shelter$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $140,771 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSeatac BMX: $124,124 over 2y, 25% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $117,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetACE MENTOR SAN DIEGO INC: $70,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetCHELSEA'S LIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetFRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $54,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAS PATRONAS: $51,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOLUTIONS EXPLORING SUCCESS POST HS: $40,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTeam River Runner Incorporated: $40,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOAKLAND SCHOOL INC: $36,400 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS CHANCE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSADDLES IN SERVICE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHere With Hope Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetCRISIS HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCancer Angels of San Diego: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSISU ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPillar Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeam Parker For Life: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFuture Construction Leaders Foundation: $18,450 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA RESTAURANT FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSan Francisco Fire Fighters Cancer Prevention Foundation: $14,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHomestretch Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION HIRING HALL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA28.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Padres Foundation · Bergelectric Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crc Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crc Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Team River Runner Incorporated: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Crc Cares Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Crc Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crc Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph