Skip to content
Crawley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Crawley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$954k
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$865kHuman Services$494kArts & Culture$490kFood & Nutrition$352kEnvironment$243kInternational$235kReligion$148kHousing & Shelter$131kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $735k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$75,000
FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$50,000
COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC$40,000
OPERA COLORADO$40,000
THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$35,000
NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC$30,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$30,000
DALLAS CHILDREN'S THEATER$25,000
THE URBAN MISSION INC$25,000
FOOD AND SHELTER INC$25,000
OPERA COLORADO$25,000
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$25,000
MOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $15k → 17%GOODLAND INC: $10k → 24%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $15k → 17%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $5k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 13%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $30k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES: $8k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 12%HOPE SUPPLY CO (FORMERLY CAPTAIN HOPE'S KIDS): $10k → 14%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 12%HOPE SUPPLY COMPANY: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY COMPANY: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO (FORMERLY CAPTAIN HOPE'S KIDS): $5k → 14%DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
CO
KY
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Crawley Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 40% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 32%.

Crawley Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 52 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
25

Total granted

$2.9M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+21%

Still filing today

85%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $235k · revenue +84%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $228k · revenue +21%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • OC
    OU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • DM
    DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -8%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
9
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Goodland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
54/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC: $227,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INCTHE URBAN MISSION INC: $185,000 · OtherTHE URBAN MISSION INCTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $142,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCAUSTIN PRESBYTERIAN THEOLOGIAL SEMINARY: $142,000 · OtherAUSTIN PRESBYTERIAN THEOLOGIAL SEMINARYHITCHCOCK CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $70,000 · OtherFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $85,000 · OtherFOOD AND SHELTER INC+43 more: $511,500 · Other+43 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $237,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKL…Texas A&M Foundation: $225,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundat…+6 more: $45,000 · Education+6 moreOPERA COLORADO: $148,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA COLORADODALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CHILDREN…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $40,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTE…OKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC: $33,500 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA PHILHA…OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $33,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS I…ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $32,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $82,500 · Human ServicesNORTH DALLAS…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISI…WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S FUND…VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEAD…HOPE SUPPLY CO: $35,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY …THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S …CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesPOETIC: $15,000 · Human Services+2 more: $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE: $235,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $137,550 · Food & NutritionCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+5 more: $17,500 · Food & NutritionMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $60,000 · Environment
Other$1,363,000Education$507,000Arts & Culture$446,500Human Services$364,500International$250,000Food & Nutrition$170,050Environment$135,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $237,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE: $235,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC: $227,500 over 5y, 21% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN MISSION INC: $185,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetOPERA COLORADO: $148,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $142,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $137,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $82,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHITCHCOCK CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $70,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMETRO CARING: $38,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetROSE ROCK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $35,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC: $33,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS TREES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOETIC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE PARK PEOPLE: $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord…American Fidelity Fou…The Dallas FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…The Anne and Henry Za…Records Johnston Fami…Communities Foundatio…Rose Community Founda…Cresap Family Foundat…The Addy FoundationSarkeys FoundationHillcrest Foundation
El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Records Johnston Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Rose Community Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crawley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crawley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Hitchcock Center for the Environment Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Dean Mcgee Eye Institute: 1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New England Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crawley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home