Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crawford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$287k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$889kArts & Culture$304kHealth$97kEnvironment$59kRecreation & Sports$41kHuman Services$28kAnimals$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Learning Project$120,000
Solheim Lutheran Home a California Nonstock Corporation$25,000
Pilgrim School$20,000
St Botolph Club Foundation$15,500
Sarah Lawrence College$15,500
Runway for Recovery$10,000
World Central Kitchen$10,000
WGBH (fbo GBH Educational Foundation)$10,000
Yale University$10,000
Garden Club of the Back Bay Inc$6,000
Native Plant Trust$5,000
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center$5,000
Friends of the Public Garden$5,000
Pitzer College$5,000
Alexander & Baldwin Sugar Museum$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Runway for Recovery: $10k → 10%Runway for Recovery: $10k → 10%Runway for Recovery: $10k → 10%Runway for Recovery: $10k → 10%Runway for Recovery: $5k → 10%Runway for Recovery: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 43 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+25%

Still filing today

77%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEARNING PROJECT INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $425k · revenue +22%
  • BB
    BOSTON BAROQUE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $164k · revenue +75%
  • SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • BO
    BRING ON THE MUSIC INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -62%
  • WESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +98%
  • HF
    HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
4
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
7
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
8
Florence Griswold Museum Inc

The florence griswold museum seeks to promote a greater understanding of connecticut's contribution to american art and history through public exhibitions and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
10
New England Aquarium Corporation

The new england aquarium is a catalyst for global change through public engagement and education, commitment to marine animal conservation, innovative scientific research, and effective advocacy for a vital and vibrant ocean.

Animals
11
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of the American Revolution

The museum of the american revolution uncovers and shares compelling stories about the diverse people and complex events that sparked america's ongoing experiment in liberty, equality and self-government.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
41/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LEARNING PROJECT INC: $425,250 · OtherTHE LEARNING PROJECT INCThe Learning Project Elementary School: $200,000 · OtherThe Learning Project Elementary SchoolYALE UNIVERSITY: $55,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYPilgrim School: $40,000 · OtherST BOTOLPH CLUB FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Other+22 more: $90,500 · Other+22 moreBOSTON BAROQUE INC: $163,500 · Arts & CultureBOSTON BAROQUE INCWGBH Educational Foundation: $40,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educational Fou…ALEXANDER & BALDWIN SUGAR MUSEUM: $26,000 · Arts & CultureALEXANDER & BALDWIN …MUSICAL CREATORS INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL CREATORS INS…+6 more: $13,750 · Arts & CultureSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $118,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENC…Pitzer College: $30,000 · EducationPitzer Colleg…BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL: $9,000 · Education+4 more: $12,250 · Education+4 moreGarden Club of the Back Bay Inc: $33,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF GRIFFITH PARK: $4,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER: $4,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentRUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 · HealthValley Regional Hospital Inc: $7,500 · HealthTHE DAVID K JOHNSON FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 · Health+3 more: $750 · HealthGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · AnimalsMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · Animals+1 more: $250 · Animals
Other$838,750Arts & Culture$268,250Education$169,250Environment$80,000Human Services$50,000Health$40,000Animals$12,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LEARNING PROJECT INC: $425,250 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetBOSTON BAROQUE INC: $163,500 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $118,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetRUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC: $50,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGarden Club of the Back Bay Inc: $33,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPitzer College: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST BOTOLPH CLUB FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetALEXANDER & BALDWIN SUGAR MUSEUM: $26,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetMUSICAL CREATORS INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetValley Regional Hospital Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLIMMERGLASS OPERA THEATRE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRING ON THE MUSIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF GRIFFITH PARK: $4,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOJAI VALLEY SCHOOL: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMONTCLAIR KIMBERLEY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetArt Jewelry Forum: $2,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAMBRIDGE CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC: $2,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ART OGUNQUIT D/B/A OGUNQUIT MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID K JOHNSON FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 6y, 16% of budgetTHE GIBSON SOCIETY INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OF THE BACK BAY INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWellesley College: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS FELIZ IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $1,250 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLyric Stage Company of Boston Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOSTON COMMITTEE OF THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PHILHARMONIC INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERRILL HOUSE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LEARNING PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON BAROQUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Garden Club of the Back Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Pitzer College ↗
  • Who funds ST BOTOLPH CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDER & BALDWIN SUGAR MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL CREATORS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Valley Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLIMMERGLASS OPERA THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRING ON THE MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GRIFFITH PARK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER ↗
  • Who funds OJAI VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MONTCLAIR KIMBERLEY ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Art Jewelry Forum ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ART OGUNQUIT D/B/A OGUNQUIT MUSEUM OF ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA17.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · William L Murphy & Claire M Corcoran Family Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Ibm International Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crawford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crawford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Sherrill House Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Cambridge Camping Association Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • New England Philharmonic Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boston Baroque Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Plimoth Patuxet Museums Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester Art Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Buckingham Browne & Nichols School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Crawford Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Crawford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crawford’s filings →

More from the funding graph