· Private foundation
Cranshaw Corporation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $118k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $327k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMNION PREGNANCY CARE MEDICAL CENTER | $120,000 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE | $100,000 |
| HAITI REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC | $90,000 |
| COLT COEUR THEATER COMPANY | $40,000 |
| WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL | $35,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $30,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED | $30,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE GOOD SAMARITAN | $30,000 |
| ADVANCE SERVICES WESTMINSTER COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $22,000 |
| PRATT INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| HALCYON FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE HOLY COMFORTER | $15,000 |
| CITY SQUASH INC | $10,000 |
| STONE CHURCH & MEETINGHOUSE OF THE FIRST ECCLESIASTICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $184k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHAITI REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $558k · revenue +306% · 50% of their budget
- APAMNION PREGNANCY CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $505k · revenue +94%
- NTNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC7× · 2017–2025 · $363k · revenue +645%
Funded once
- CPCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +76%
- USUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERAone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +6%
- FEFIRST ECCLESTASTICAL SOCETY OF NEW PRESTONone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)
Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.
The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ranfurly Homes for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAITI REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMNION PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds COLT COEUR THEATER COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds CHRISTS HOME ↗
- Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
- Who funds THOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HALCYON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds RANFURLY HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
- Who funds LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHADD INC CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE LONDON LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Homestretch Inc ↗
- Who funds TLC - The Treatment & Learning Centers ↗
- Who funds PARTAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds KATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Connecticut Community Foundation · H & L Family Foundation Inc · The Melinda & William J Vanden Heuvel Foundation Inc · Murray & Susan Haber Charitable Foundation · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · The New York Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cranshaw Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partakers Inc — 59% of income from government
- Chadd Inc Children and Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder — 31% of income from government
- Washington Art Association Incorporated — 2% of income from government
- Bantam Cinema & Arts Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Old Colony Historical Society — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cranshaw Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Cranshaw Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.