· Private foundation
Craddock Ruby J - Memorial Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE | $15,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH | $15,000 |
| BIRCH CREEK SERVICE RANCH | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC | $5,000 |
| UTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH | $5,000 |
| YWCA OF UTAH | $5,000 |
| THE INN BETWEEN | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| GIRL SCOUT OF UTAH | $5,000 |
| UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE | $5,000 |
| BUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD | $5,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF UTAH INC | $5,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CNCOMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE8× · 2018–2025 · $141k · revenue +34%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH8× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +97%
- BCBIRCH CREEK SERVICE RANCH6× · 2018–2025 · $53k · revenue +35%
Funded once
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +39%- MMMENDING MINDS VILLAGEone grant, 2024 · $10k · 41% of their budget
- VOVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAHgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…
We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…
Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
Children's service society provides services to families, individuals and the community to enhance the safety and well-being of children and their caregivers. all the services help prevent child abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Futures and the most unlike its peers is Mending Minds Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds BIRCH CREEK SERVICE RANCH ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FUTURES ↗
- Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah ↗
- Who funds DOVE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MENDING MINDS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
- Who funds BUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD ↗
- Who funds EYE CARE FOR KIDS - Utah ↗
- Who funds Little Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds CANYONLANDS FIELD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds CACHE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Petersen Bruce & Cecilia Fdn-Main · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Utah Medical Association Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Craddock Ruby J - Memorial Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.