Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cozad Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$67kEducation$38kEnvironment$27kHealth$24kRecreation & Sports$19kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$11kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY MUSIC SOCIETY$20,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE$5,000
MICHIGAN TROUT UNLIMITED$5,000
ALMA COLLEGE$5,000
RUTH ELLIS CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,359
STAND WITH TRANS$2,500
BAY VETERANS FOUNDATION$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
CAN COUNCIL BAY COUNTY$2,000
MY MICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,000
HIDDEN HARVEST$1,500
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN$1,500
HEADWATERS LAND CONSERVANCY$1,500
SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 13%STAND WITH TRANS: $3k → 8%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $2k → 13%CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 20 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$201k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+54%

Still filing today

60%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTH ELLIS CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +51%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +41%
  • HH
    HIDDEN HARVEST
    3× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +199%

Funded once

  • HN
    HOUSE N2 HOME INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • PS
    POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +54%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DENTAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
3
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
4
Six Rivers Land Conservancy Fka Six Rivers Regional Land Conservancy

To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special

Environment
5
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
6
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy

The mission of gtrlc is to protect significant natural, scenic and farm lands and advance land stewardship now and for future generations.

Environment
7
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
8
Michigan Water Environment Association

Be and create stewards for the water environment of michigan. provide high quality education for michigan's water professionals. educate and inform policy makers and the general public. promote scientifically sound environmental practices…

Environment
9
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
10
Southwest Michigan Land Conservency Inc

Acquisition and conservation of natural areas.

Environment
11
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
12
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trout Unlimited Michigan Council; the most unlike its peers is Bay Veterans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY MUSIC SOCIETY: $51,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY MUSIC SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLARKE HISTORICAL LIBRARY: $5,500 · OtherPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY DENTAL CENTER: $5,000 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL: $8,800 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCILUNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY+13 more: $30,109 · Other+13 moreALMA COLLEGE: $38,000 · EducationALMA COLLEGEHEADWATERS LAND CONSERVANCY: $8,500 · EnvironmentSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $7,500 · EnvironmentLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,500 · EnvironmentRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsHIDDEN HARVEST: $8,250 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesStand With Trans: $2,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES: $1,000 · Human ServicesBAY VETERANS FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropySaginaw Community Foundation: $2,000 · PhilanthropyHOUSE N2 HOME INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$121,409Education$38,000Environment$18,500Recreation & Sports$18,000Human Services$16,750Philanthropy$14,000Housing & Shelter$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALMA COLLEGE: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAY VETERANS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL: $8,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHEADWATERS LAND CONSERVANCY: $8,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST: $8,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE N2 HOME INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStand With Trans: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALMA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BAY VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HEADWATERS LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE N2 HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Stand With Trans ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Bay Area Community Foundation · Dow Company Foundation · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cozad Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cozad Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cozad Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cozad Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cozad Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph