Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coretz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
78
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$447k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.7MHealth$2.4MEducation$2.4MFood & Nutrition$1.7MHousing & Shelter$1.4MCommunity Improvement$1.3MScience & Tech$1.0MSocial Science$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 78 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $529k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $757k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$446,500
CITY YEAR TULSA$310,000
GILCREASE MUSEUM$200,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$173,125
HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA$150,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA$115,000
LEADERSHIP TULSA$100,000
STILL SHE RISES$100,000
READING PARTNERS$100,000
YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP$100,000
ACT HOUSE$100,000
URBAN CODERS GUILD$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$100,000
OKLAHOMA POLICY INSTITUTE$100,000
BLACK WALL STREET BUSINESS CENTER$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $756k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Vizavance: $2k → 16%Third Option Foundation: $100k → 6%Vizavance: $1k → 16%Third Option Foundation: $50k → 6%Third Option Foundation: $50k → 6%VIZAVANCE: $1k → 16%INVEST FOR KIDS: $1k → 14%THE COMMON GOOD: $10k → 14%THE COMMON GOOD: $3k → 14%Gatesway Foundation Inc: $3k → 15%BLACK QUEER TULSA: $18k → 15%DVIS: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 15%DVIS: $365 → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 15%NEW SANCTUARY EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $10k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $10k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $5k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 15%THE UMA CENTER: $100k → 15%THE UMA CENTER: $100k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER: $30k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $100k → 15%MODUS: $25k → 15%MODUS: $20k → 15%MODUS: $25k → 15%MODUS: $20k → 15%MODUS: $10k → 15%AMPLIFY: $10k → 15%MODUS: $10k → 15%AMPLIFY: $10k → 15%AMPLIFY YOUTH HEALTH COLLECTIVE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 98 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

98 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
80

Total granted

$17M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+23%

Still filing today

62%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $474k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CITY YEAR INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +8%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +243%
  • IRON GATE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $731k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • TC
    TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $420k · revenue -28%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS TULSA
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
5
Kipp Tulsa Academy College Prep Inc

Kipp tulsa prepares students from educationally under-served neighborhoods in tulsa, ok with the academic, character and life skills necessary for success in college and the competitive world beyond.

Education
6
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
8
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
9
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
10
The State Chamber Research Foundation

The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

Unclassified
11
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
12
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Saint Francis Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/122
Grantees still filing
79/122
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY YEAR INC: $1,067,500 · OtherCITY YEAR INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $942,898 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM DISCOVERY LAB: $600,000 · OtherTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $525,722 · OtherA NEW LEAF INC: $520,000 · OtherI2E INC: $500,001 · Other36 DEGREES NORTH CO: $552,000 · OtherIRON GATE INC: $731,166 · OtherIRON GATE INCOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $659,208 · OtherHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $505,000 · Other+139 more: $6,291,803 · Other+139 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,969,030 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY F…JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $120,500 · Philanthropy+8 more: $188,500 · Philanthropy+8 moreTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $1,152,043 · Housing & ShelterTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $200,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $26,500 · Housing & ShelterMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $588,000 · HealthHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $572,994 · HealthScleroderma Research Foundation: $61,500 · Health+11 more: $86,270 · HealthTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,024,989 · Social ScienceUrban Coders Guild: $226,000 · EducationYOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC: $200,000 · EducationTulsa Community College Foundation: $101,500 · EducationTULSA LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC: $55,000 · EducationRiverfield Country Day School: $38,350 · Education+10 more: $76,750 · EducationStill She Rises Inc: $351,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $225,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $40,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$12,895,298Philanthropy$3,278,030Housing & Shelter$1,378,543Health$1,308,764Social Science$1,024,989Education$977,600Crime & Legal$816,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,969,030 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $1,152,043 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,067,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,024,989 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $731,166 over 8y, 20% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $659,208 over 6y, 10% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $588,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $572,994 over 7y, 4.3% of budget36 DEGREES NORTH CO: $552,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $525,722 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $520,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $505,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $420,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetStill She Rises Inc: $351,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetRIVER PARKS AUTHORITY: $250,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUrban Coders Guild: $226,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $225,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLEADERSHIP TULSA INC: $202,652 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetThe Uma Center Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetBlack Wall Street Business Center: $200,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetYOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC: $200,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetOKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetThe Town & Country School Inc: $182,700 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $175,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $120,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetModus Inc: $110,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $101,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTULSA LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $100,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetScleroderma Research Foundation: $61,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $55,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $40,250 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetRiverfield Country Day School: $38,350 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGROWING TOGETHER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmplify Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $26,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
  • Who funds HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES ↗
  • Who funds 36 DEGREES NORTH CO ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Still She Rises Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIVER PARKS AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds Urban Coders Guild ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Uma Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds Black Wall Street Business Center ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Town & Country School Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kaiser Family FoundationOK109.3× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · Hille Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coretz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coretz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 430%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Up With Trees Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
43get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 216 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coretz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph